Regional variations in gastric bypass surgery: results from the 2005 nationwide inpatient sample
- PMID: 18431610
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-008-9524-9
Regional variations in gastric bypass surgery: results from the 2005 nationwide inpatient sample
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to use nationally representative data to examine regional variations in the use and outcomes of gastric bypass surgery.
Methods: Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we identified adults undergoing gastric bypass surgery (n = 92,910) in 2005. Following descriptive analyses, multiple logistic regression models were constructed to examine regional variations in the likelihood of laparoscopic vs. open approaches and in the likelihood of complications while controlling for patient and hospital characteristics.
Results: After indirectly adjusting for age and sex, the gastric bypass rates per 100,000 were as follows: Northeast, 70; Midwest, 39; South, 37; and West, 61. After adjusting for both patient and hospital characteristics, the odds of receiving laparoscopic surgery for patients living in the West were 1.79 times the mean [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67-1.92], while the odds of receiving laparoscopic surgery for patients in the Midwest were 0.66 of the mean (95% CI: 0.62-0.70) and those of the Northeast were 0.88 of the mean (95% CI: 0.83-0.94). When adjusting for both patient and hospital characteristics, the odds of one or more postoperative complications among patients living in the South were greater than the mean (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26).
Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest that gastric bypass surgery is more common in the Northeast and West. There is a greater likelihood of gastric bypass being performed laparoscopically in the West; it is less likely to be performed in the Northeast and Midwest. Postoperative complications are more likely to occur in the South.
Similar articles
-
Cholecystectomy concomitant with laparoscopic gastric bypass: a trend analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2008.Obes Surg. 2012 Feb;22(2):220-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0575-y. Obes Surg. 2012. PMID: 22183984
-
Comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open bariatric surgery.Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d953a. Ann Surg. 2008. PMID: 18580201
-
Analysis of factors predictive of gastrointestinal tract leak in laparoscopic and open gastric bypass.Arch Surg. 2011 Sep;146(9):1048-51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.203. Arch Surg. 2011. PMID: 21931002
-
The effects of laparoscopic vs. open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Obes Rev. 2011 Apr;12(4):254-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00757.x. Obes Rev. 2011. PMID: 20546145 Review.
-
Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass in Elderly Patients (60 Years or Older): A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.Scand J Surg. 2018 Mar;107(1):6-13. doi: 10.1177/1457496917731183. Epub 2017 Sep 25. Scand J Surg. 2018. PMID: 28942708 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):885-899. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1613-6. Epub 2017 Aug 5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017. PMID: 28780622 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
