An iconic language for the graphical representation of medical concepts
- PMID: 18435838
- PMCID: PMC2413217
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-16
An iconic language for the graphical representation of medical concepts
Abstract
Background: Many medication errors are encountered in drug prescriptions, which would not occur if practitioners could remember the drug properties. They can refer to drug monographs to find these properties, however drug monographs are long and tedious to read during consultation. We propose a two-step approach for facilitating access to drug monographs. The first step, presented here, is the design of a graphical language, called VCM.
Methods: The VCM graphical language was designed using a small number of graphical primitives and combinatory rules. VCM was evaluated over 11 volunteer general practitioners to assess if the language is easy to learn, to understand and to use. Evaluators were asked to register their VCM training time, to indicate the meaning of VCM icons and sentences, and to answer clinical questions related to randomly generated drug monograph-like documents, supplied in text or VCM format.
Results: VCM can represent the various signs, diseases, physiological states, life habits, drugs and tests described in drug monographs. Grammatical rules make it possible to generate many icons by combining a small number of primitives and reusing simple icons to build more complex ones. Icons can be organized into simple sentences to express drug recommendations. Evaluation showed that VCM was learnt in 2 to 7 hours, that physicians understood 89% of the tested VCM icons, and that they answered correctly to 94% of questions using VCM (versus 88% using text, p = 0.003) and 1.8 times faster (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: VCM can be learnt in a few hours and appears to be easy to read. It can now be used in a second step: the design of graphical interfaces facilitating access to drug monographs. It could also be used for broader applications, including the design of interfaces for consulting other types of medical document or medical data, or, very simply, to enrich medical texts.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Design of a graphical and interactive interface for facilitating access to drug contraindications, cautions for use, interactions and adverse effects.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Jun 2;8:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-21. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008. PMID: 18518945 Free PMC article.
-
Validating the semantics of a medical iconic language using ontological reasoning.J Biomed Inform. 2013 Feb;46(1):56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 10. J Biomed Inform. 2013. PMID: 22975315
-
Combining Semantic and Lexical Methods for Mapping MedDRA to VCM Icons.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:905-909. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018. PMID: 29678092
-
The impact of CPOE medication systems' design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders: a systematic review.Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(1):3-19. doi: 10.3414/ME0630. Epub 2009 Jul 6. Methods Inf Med. 2010. PMID: 19582333 Review.
-
Computer-related medication errors in neonatal intensive care units.Clin Perinatol. 2008 Mar;35(1):119-39, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.11.005. Clin Perinatol. 2008. PMID: 18280879 Review.
Cited by
-
A Web Interface for Antibiotic Prescription Recommendations in Primary Care: User-Centered Design Approach.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e25741. doi: 10.2196/25741. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34114958 Free PMC article.
-
How to interact with medical terminologies? Formative usability evaluations comparing three approaches for supporting the use of MedDRA by pharmacovigilance specialists.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 9;20(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01280-1. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 33036603 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Medication Information Presentation Through Interactive Visualization in Mobile Apps: Human Factors Design.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Nov 25;7(11):e15940. doi: 10.2196/15940. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31763991 Free PMC article.
-
Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):585-592. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx118. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29126196 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medicons: toward clinical examination diagrams standardization in medical documentation.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 May 22;8:347-351. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S133681. eCollection 2017. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017. PMID: 28579872 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Moore T, Cohen M, Furberg C. Serious Adverse Drug Events Reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998–2005. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1752–1759. - PubMed
-
- Bobb A, Gleason K, Husch M, Feinglass J, Yarnold P, Noskin G. The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential impact of computerized prescriber order entry. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:785–792. - PubMed
-
- Dovey S, Phillips R, Green L, Fryer G. Types of medical errors commonly reported by family physicians. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:697. - PubMed
-
- Jayawardena S, Eisdorfer J, Indulkar S, Pal S, Sooriabalan D, Cucco R. Prescription errors and the impact of computerized prescription order entry system in a community-based hospital. Am J Ther. 2007;14:336–40. - PubMed
-
- Varkey P, Aponte P, Swanton C, Fischer D, Johnson S, Brennan M. The effect of computerized physician-order entry on outpatient prescription errors. Manag Care Interface. 2007;20:53–57. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
