Background: This study aimed to determine whether the increasing emphasis on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) influences hiring practices within academic surgical departments.
Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to chairs of surgery departments and divisions of general surgery at the 16 Canadian academic institutions. Nonresponders were identified and contacted directly. The survey consisted of 34 questions, including Likert scales, single answers, and multiple-choice questions. Data were collected on demographics, perceptions of MIS, and recruitment/hiring. At the time of the survey, two department chair positions were vacant.
Results: A response rate of 87% (26/30) was obtained, with representation from 94% of departments (15/16). Of those surveyed, 88% intend to increase the importance of MIS at their institution within 5 years, and 87% intend to achieve this objective through new hirings. Networking (73%) and retention of recent graduates (89%) were cited most frequently as recruitment strategies. Strengthening the division, research, and education were considered important or extremely important by more than 90% of the respondents with respect to recruitment goals, whereas strengthening MIS was considered important or extremely important by 50%. Within 5 years, surgical departments intend to hire a median of four general surgeons, 50% of whom will have formal MIS training. In comparison, over the past 10 years, only 25% of new recruits had formal MIS training. More than 90% of the respondents considered formal MIS fellowship, MIS fellowship plus a second fellowship, and proctorship to be adequate training for performing advanced MIS, whereas traditional methods were considered inadequate. Lack of operative time and resource issues were considered most limiting in the hiring of new MIS surgeons.
Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery is growing in importance within academic surgical departments, but it remains an intermediate recruitment priority. Formal MIS training appears to be important in the recruiting of new surgeons, whereas traditional training methods are considered inadequate.