Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force
- PMID: 18443767
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1392-y
Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force
Abstract
The brain can accurately predict the forces needed to efficiently manipulate familiar objects in relation to mechanical properties such as weight. These predictions involve memory or some type of central representation, but visual analysis of size also yields accurate predictions of the needed fingertip forces. This raises the issue of which process (weight memory or visual size analysis) is used during everyday life when handling familiar objects. Our aim was to determine if subjects use a sensorimotor memory of weight, or a visual size analysis, to predictively set their vertical lift force when lifting a recently handled object. Two groups of subjects lifted an opaque brown bottle filled with water (470 g) during the first experimental session, and then rested for 15 min in a different room. Both groups were told that they would lift the same bottle in their next session. However, the experimental group returned to lift a slightly smaller bottle filled with water (360 g) that otherwise was identical in appearance to the first bottle. The control group returned to lift the same bottle from the first session, which was only partially filled with water so that it also weighed 360 g. At the end of the second session subjects were asked if they observed any changes between sessions, but no subject indicated awareness of a specific change. An acceleration ratio was computed by dividing the peak vertical acceleration during the first lift of the second session by the average peak acceleration of the last five lifts during the first session. This ratio was >1 for the control subjects 1.30 (SEM 0.08), indicating that they scaled their lift force for the first lift of the second session based on a memory of the (heavier) bottle from the first session. In contrast, the acceleration ratio was 0.94 (0.10) for the experimental group (P < 0.011). We conclude that the experimental group processed visual cues concerning the size of the bottle. These findings raise the possibility that even with familiar objects we predict fingertip forces using an on-line visual analysis of size (along with memory of density), rather than accessing memory related to object weight.
Similar articles
-
Sensorimotor memory for fingertip forces: evidence for a task-independent motor memory.J Neurosci. 2003 Mar 1;23(5):1981-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-05-01981.2003. J Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 12629204 Free PMC article.
-
Old age impairs the use of arbitrary visual cues for predictive control of fingertip forces during grasp.Exp Brain Res. 2002 Mar;143(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0965-9. Epub 2002 Jan 8. Exp Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 11907688
-
Material evidence: interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects.J Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep;108(5):1262-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00263.2012. Epub 2012 Jun 13. J Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22696542 Clinical Trial.
-
Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting.Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 3;196(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.07.031. Epub 2008 Aug 5. Behav Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 18722479 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of expectancies in the size-weight illusion: a review of theoretical and empirical arguments and a new explanation.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1404-14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0634-1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 24737065 Review.
Cited by
-
The Visual Perception of Material Properties Affects Motor Planning in Prehension: An Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Components of Lifting Cups.Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 18;11:215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00215. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32132955 Free PMC article.
-
Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.J Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;115(4):1946-53. doi: 10.1152/jn.00587.2015. Epub 2016 Feb 3. J Neurophysiol. 2016. PMID: 26843597 Free PMC article.
-
Multisensory training improves the development of spatial cognition after sight restoration from congenital cataracts.iScience. 2024 Feb 9;27(3):109167. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109167. eCollection 2024 Mar 15. iScience. 2024. PMID: 38414862 Free PMC article.
-
Infants' grip strength predicts mu rhythm attenuation during observation of lifting actions with weighted blocks.Dev Sci. 2016 Mar;19(2):195-207. doi: 10.1111/desc.12308. Epub 2015 May 1. Dev Sci. 2016. PMID: 25939632 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of visual cues of object density on perception and anticipatory control of dexterous manipulation.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076855. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24146935 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
