Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;43(3):1006-24.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00802.x.

Evidence-based imaging guidelines and Medicare payment policy

Affiliations

Evidence-based imaging guidelines and Medicare payment policy

Christopher L Sistrom et al. Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the relationship between evidence-based appropriateness criteria for neurologic imaging procedures and Medicare payment determinations. The primary research question is whether Medicare is more likely to pay for imaging procedures as the level of appropriateness increases.

Data sources: The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACRAC) for neurological imaging, ICD-9-CM codes, CPT codes, and payment determinations by the Medicare Part B carrier for Florida and Connecticut.

Study design: Cross-sectional study of appropriateness criteria and Medicare Part B payment policy for neurological imaging. In addition to descriptive and bivariate statistics, multivariate logistic regression on payment determination (yes or no) was performed.

Data collection methods: The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACRAC) documents specific to neurological imaging, ICD-9-CM codes, and CPT codes were used to create 2,510 medical condition/imaging procedure combinations, with associated appropriateness scores (coded as low/middle/high).

Principal findings: As the level of appropriateness increased, more medical condition/imaging procedure combinations were payable (low = 61 percent, middle = 70 percent, and high = 74 percent). Logistic regression indicated that the odds of a medical condition/imaging procedure combination with a middle level of appropriateness being payable was 48 percent higher than for an otherwise similar combination with a low appropriateness score (95 percent CI on odds ratio=1.19-1.84). The odds ratio for being payable between high and low levels of appropriateness was 2.25 (95 percent CI: 1.66-3.04).

Conclusions: Medicare could improve its payment determinations by taking advantage of existing clinical guidelines, appropriateness criteria, and other authoritative resources for evidence-based practice. Such an approach would give providers a financial incentive that is aligned with best-practice medicine. In particular, Medicare should review and update its payment policies to reflect current information on the appropriateness of alternative imaging procedures for the same medical condition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2003. - PubMed
    1. American College of Radiology (ACR) “American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria™”. 2005. [August 11, 2005]. Available at http://www.acr.org/ac.
    1. American Medical Association. “Common Procedure Terminology Codes”. 2005. [August 11, 2005]. Available at http://catalog.ama-assn.org/Catalog/cpt/cpt_home.jsp.
    1. Anonymous. CPT and ICD-9 Code Systems Approved as the National Standard. ACR Bulletin. 2000;56:4.
    1. Barnato A E, Garber A M. Performance of the RAND Appropriateness Criteria. Medical Decision Making. 2003;23:177–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms