The Rome III Classification of dyspepsia: will it help research?

Dig Dis. 2008;26(3):203-9. doi: 10.1159/000121347. Epub 2008 May 6.

Abstract

A major change in the Rome III criteria relates to the condition previously called functional dyspepsia (FD). Rome I and Rome II defined FD as pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen without a definite structural or biochemical explanation. The condition was further sub-classified into ulcer-like or dysmotility-like dyspepsia. However, subsequent studies failed to show that single-symptoms are present in the vast majority of patients, and most symptoms failed to correlate with any physiological abnormalities. In Rome III, FD as a broad category was no longer considered useful in terms of research, but rather was defined by two new symptom entities, namely epigastric pain (epigastric pain syndrome) and meal-related symptoms (postprandial distress syndrome). We predict these changes will stimulate new research into the underlying pathophysiological disturbances, as well as impact the diagnosis and treatment of dyspepsia; the classification should advance the field, and we review the challenges ahead.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Dyspepsia / classification*
  • Dyspepsia / drug therapy
  • Dyspepsia / physiopathology
  • Female
  • Gastric Emptying / physiology
  • Gastrointestinal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Gastrointestinal Motility / physiology
  • Helicobacter Infections / complications
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postprandial Period
  • Prognosis
  • Research / standards
  • Research / trends

Substances

  • Gastrointestinal Agents