Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy
- PMID: 18483825
- DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9366-5
Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the risk factors of parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal rectal amputation.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent abdominoperineal rectal amputation for rectal cancer between January 1999 and August 2006. The effects of age, sex, surgical approach, chemotherapy, waist circumference, and body mass index on the development of a parastomal hernia were analyzed.
Results: Forty-one patients underwent 19 open and 22 laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputations. A parastomal hernia developed in 19 patients (46 percent) after a median follow-up period of 31 (range, 5-80) months. We observed ten hernias in the open group and nine in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.453). There were no significant differences in the type of surgical approach, age, sex, or adjuvant therapy in patients who developed a parastomal hernia compared with those who did not. Waist circumference proved to be an independent risk factor (P = 0.011). When the waist circumference exceeds the calculated threshold of 100 cm, there is a 75 percent probability to develop a parastomal hernia.
Conclusions: Abdominal obesity increases the risk of developing a parastomal hernia, therefore, it might be advisable to place a prophylactic mesh during colostomy formation when the patient's waist exceeds 100 cm.
Similar articles
-
Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Sep;55(9):963-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825fb5ff. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012. PMID: 22874603
-
Prospective, Randomized Study on the Use of a Prosthetic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia of Permanent Colostomy.Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Oct;58(10):943-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000443. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015. PMID: 26347966 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic giant parastomal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh.Tech Coloproctol. 2002 Dec;6(3):187-90. doi: 10.1007/s101510200041. Tech Coloproctol. 2002. PMID: 12525914
-
[Treatment of parastomal colostomy hernia].Minerva Chir. 1999 Nov;54(11):749-54. Minerva Chir. 1999. PMID: 10638147 Review. Italian.
-
Parastomal hernias.Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;88(1):113-25, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.003. Surg Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 18267165 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia: A Narrative Review.Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023 Jul-Sep;11(3):187-192. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_235_22. Epub 2023 Jul 15. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37533654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Other Double Bubble Sign: Gastric Parastomal Hernia.CRSLS. 2021 Apr 7;8(1):e2020.00092. doi: 10.4293/CRSLS.2020.00092. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar. CRSLS. 2021. PMID: 36017470 Free PMC article.
-
Is absorbable mesh useful in preventing parastomal hernia after emergency surgery? The PARTHENOPE study.Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02579-w. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Hernia. 2022. PMID: 35195798 Clinical Trial.
-
Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;37(3):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04068-5. Epub 2022 Jan 14. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 35028686 Review.
-
Preoperative Progressive Pneumoperitoneum and Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients With Large Parastomal Hernia.Front Surg. 2021 Jun 7;8:683612. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.683612. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34164428 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources