MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results
- PMID: 18492904
- PMCID: PMC2894569
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3123
MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential value of MR elastography (MRE) in the characterization of solid liver tumors.
Materials and methods: Forty-four liver tumors (14 metastatic lesions, 12 hepatocellular carcinomas, nine hemangiomas, five cholangiocarcinomas, three cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, and one hepatic adenoma) were evaluated with MRE. MRE was performed with a 1.5-T system with a modified phase-contrast gradient-echo sequence to collect axial wave images sensitized along the through-plane motion direction. The tumors were identified on T2- and T1-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, and the MRE images were obtained through the tumor. A stiffness map (elastogram) was generated in an automated process consisting of an inversion algorithm. The mean shear stiffness of the tumor was calculated with a manually specified region of interest over the tumor in the stiffness map. The stiffness value of tumor-free hepatic parenchyma was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed on the stiffness values for differentiation of normal liver, fibrotic liver, benign tumors, and malignant tumors.
Results: Malignant liver tumors had significantly greater mean shear stiffness than benign tumors (10.1 kPa vs 2.7 kPa, p < 0.001), fibrotic liver (10.1 kPa vs 5.9 kPa, p < 0.001), and normal liver (10.1 kPa vs 2.3 kPa, p < 0.001). Fibrotic livers had stiffness values overlapping both the benign and the malignant tumors. A cutoff value of 5 kPa accurately differentiated malignant tumors from benign tumors and normal liver parenchyma in this preliminary investigation.
Conclusion: MR elastography is a promising noninvasive technique for assessing solid liver tumors. Use of MRE may lead to new quantitative tissue characterization parameters for differentiating benign and malignant liver tumors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions.Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb;26(2):398-406. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3835-8. Epub 2015 Jun 2. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26032879
-
Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions: preliminary findings.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Feb;36(2):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.10.009. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010. PMID: 20018432
-
Respiratory-triggered spin-echo echo-planar imaging-based mr elastography for evaluating liver stiffness.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):391-396. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26610. Epub 2018 Dec 24. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30584687
-
REVIEW: MR elastography of brain tumors.Neuroimage Clin. 2020;25:102109. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102109. Epub 2019 Nov 23. Neuroimage Clin. 2020. PMID: 31809993 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Practical and clinical applications of pancreatic magnetic resonance elastography: a systematic review.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct;46(10):4744-4764. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03143-3. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021. PMID: 34076721 Review.
Cited by
-
Using visual cues to enhance haptic feedback for palpation on virtual model of soft tissue.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Nov;53(11):1177-86. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1309-4. Epub 2015 May 28. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015. PMID: 26018755
-
Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease: Modalities, Techniques, Limitations, and Future Directions.Radiographics. 2016 Nov-Dec;36(7):1987-2006. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016160042. Epub 2016 Sep 30. Radiographics. 2016. PMID: 27689833 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Expression of vimentin alters cell mechanics, cell-cell adhesion, and gene expression profiles suggesting the induction of a hybrid EMT in human mammary epithelial cells.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Sep 19;10:929495. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.929495. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022. PMID: 36200046 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B viral infection using magnetic resonance elastography.Korean J Radiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):210-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.210. Epub 2014 Mar 7. Korean J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24643284 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: everything you need to know to get started.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jan;47(1):94-114. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03324-0. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022. PMID: 34725719 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:241–254. - PubMed
-
- Duck FA. Physical Properties of Tissue- a Comprehensive Reference Book. San Diego, CA: Academic; 1990. pp. 225–248.
-
- Sarvazyan AGD, Maevsky E, Oranskaja G, Mironova G, Sholokhov V, Ermilova V. Elasticity imaging as a new modality of medical imaging for cancer detection. Proceedings of an International Workshop on the Interaction of Ultrasound with Biological Media. 1994:68–81.
-
- Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal. 2001;5:237–254. - PubMed
-
- Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13:111–134. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
