Decision-making about artificial feeding in end-of-life care: literature review
- PMID: 18503535
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04646.x
Decision-making about artificial feeding in end-of-life care: literature review
Abstract
Aim: This paper is a report of a review of nurses' roles and their perceptions of these roles in decision-making processes surrounding artificial food and fluid administration in adult patients.
Background: Of all caregivers, nurses have the closest and most trusting relationship with severely ill patients and their families during the entire end-of-life care process. As a result, nurses become closely involved in complex ethical decision-making processes concerning artificial administration of food or fluids for these patients.
Data sources: We searched seven electronic databases (1990-2007) and examined the reference lists of relevant papers.
Review methods: This mixed methods review was conducted with guidance of the United Kingdom Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines on systematic reviews.
Results: Although their direct impact is limited, nurses play a significant indirect role during decision-making processes. Because of their unique position, they often initiate decision-making processes, function as patient advocates and provide guidance, information and support to patients and families. Although nurses considered their role to be very valuable, they felt that their role was not always defined clearly or appreciated. Whether nurses experience decision-making processes positively depended on several contextual factors.
Conclusion: Given their knowledge and practice skills, nurses are in a prime position to contribute valuably to decision-making processes. Nevertheless, they remain sidelined. For nurses to receive sufficient recognition, their decision-making tasks and responsibilities need to be clarified and made manifest to other participants.
Similar articles
-
Nurses' attitudes towards artificial food or fluid administration in patients with dementia and in terminally ill patients: a review of the literature.J Med Ethics. 2008 Jun;34(6):431-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021493. J Med Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18511614 Review.
-
To be involved or not: factors that influence nurses' involvement in providing treatment decisional support in advanced cancer.Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Feb;13(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19010732
-
Nurses' perceptions of factors influencing patient decision support for place of care at the end of life.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009 Aug-Sep;26(4):254-63. doi: 10.1177/1049909108331316. Epub 2009 Feb 12. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009. PMID: 19213926
-
Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions.J Clin Nurs. 2006 Dec;15(12):1498-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01464.x. J Clin Nurs. 2006. PMID: 17118072
-
A review of clinical decision making: models and current research.J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(2):187-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01791.x. Epub 2007 Mar 1. J Clin Nurs. 2008. PMID: 17331095 Review.
Cited by
-
Just and inclusive end-of-life decision-making for long-term care home residents with dementia: a qualitative study protocol.BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 22;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01097-x. BMC Palliat Care. 2022. PMID: 36419147 Free PMC article.
-
Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) expert opinion/guidance on the use of clinically assisted nutrition in patients with advanced cancer.Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):2983-2992. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06613-y. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Support Care Cancer. 2022. PMID: 34665311 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' perspectives on feeding decisions for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.J Clin Nurs. 2010 Mar;19(5-6):632-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03108.x. J Clin Nurs. 2010. PMID: 20500304 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
