Workplace-specific challenges as a contribution to the diagnosis of occupational asthma

Eur Respir J. 2008 Oct;32(4):997-1003. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00100207. Epub 2008 May 28.

Abstract

The diagnosis of occupational asthma can be made by exposing workers to the relevant agent either in a hospital laboratory through specific inhalation challenges (SICs) or in the workplace. As suggested by several authors, workers with negative laboratory SIC can be monitored at the workplace under supervision. The present study aims to assess the frequency of, and identify factors associated with, a positive workplace reaction in workers with negative SIC in the laboratory. The results of workplace challenges were examined in 99 workers who underwent negative SIC between 1994 and 2004. A positive reaction either in the SIC or in the workplace was defined as a sustained fall in forced expiratory volume in one second of > or =20%. In total, 22 (22.2%) workers showed positive responses at the workplace. These subjects more often had increased baseline methacholine responsiveness (90.5 versus 67.6%). They also underwent more days of SIC testing (4.9 versus 3.3 days) and were exposed more often to two or more agents (56 versus 28.4%) and for a longer period of time (363.3 versus 220.4 min) in the laboratory. The present study illustrates the usefulness of workplace monitoring of airway function in the investigation of occupational asthma and identifies factors that are more often associated with a positive reaction.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Asthma / diagnosis*
  • Asthma / therapy
  • Female
  • Forced Expiratory Volume / drug effects
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methacholine Chloride / pharmacology
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Occupational Diseases / therapy
  • Occupational Exposure
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spirometry / methods
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Workplace

Substances

  • Methacholine Chloride