Screening adults for type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 18519931
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00008
Screening adults for type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Background: More than 19 million Americans are affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is undiagnosed in one third of these persons. In addition, it is estimated that more than 54 million adults have prediabetes. Debate continues over the benefits and harms of screening and then treating adults who have asymptomatic diabetes or prediabetes.
Purpose: To update the 2003 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on the evidence for potential benefits and harms of screening adults for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in primary care settings.
Data sources: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies and systematic reviews published in English between March 2001 and July 2007.
Study selection: Trials and observational studies that directly addressed the effectiveness and adverse effects of screening interventions were included. Randomized, controlled trials were used to assess the effectiveness of diabetes and prediabetes treatments. For diabetes interventions, trials of patients with disease for 1 year or less were included, as well as trials comparing outcomes among diabetic and nondiabetic patients.
Data extraction: Relevant data were abstracted in duplicate into a standardized template.
Data synthesis: Data were synthesized in a qualitative manner, and a random-effects meta-analysis of the effects of interventions in prediabetes on the incidence of diabetes was performed.
Limitations: Most of the data on diabetes treatment were not from primary trial data but from subgroup analyses. Participants in intensive lifestyle interventions for prediabetes may not be representative of general prediabetic populations.
Conclusion: Direct evidence is lacking on the health benefits of detecting type 2 diabetes by either targeted or mass screening, and indirect evidence also fails to demonstrate health benefits for screening general populations. Persons with hypertension probably benefit from screening, because blood pressure targets for persons with diabetes are lower than those for persons without diabetes. Intensive lifestyle and pharmacotherapeutic interventions reduce the progression of prediabetes to diabetes, but few data examine the effect of these interventions on long-term health outcomes.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for type 2 diabetes in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jun 3;148(11):I30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18519924 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Update of 2003 Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Jun. Report No.: 08-05116-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Jun. Report No.: 08-05116-EF-1. PMID: 20722158 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. PMID: 30354042 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jun 3;148(11):846-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18519930
-
Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2021 Aug 24;326(8):744-760. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10403. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34427595
-
Behavioral Counseling to Promote a Healthful Diet and Physical Activity for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Adults Without Known Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. PMID: 29364620 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Thirty-Day Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents: a First Look at the MBSAQIP Database.Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):194-199. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04866-w. Epub 2020 Jul 25. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 32712784 Free PMC article.
-
Is Master Health Checkup the Answer to Tackle the Rising Non-Communicable Disease Burden in India? - A Cross-Sectional Study.J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Jul;9(2):111-118. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.111. Epub 2019 Jul 31. J Lifestyle Med. 2019. PMID: 31828029 Free PMC article.
-
Application of three statistical models for predicting the risk of diabetes.BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Nov 26;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0456-2. BMC Endocr Disord. 2019. PMID: 31771577 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Models in Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction: Results from a Cross-sectional Retrospective Study in Chinese Adults.Curr Med Sci. 2019 Aug;39(4):582-588. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2077-4. Epub 2019 Jul 25. Curr Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31346994
-
Changes in Screening Practices for Prediabetes and Diabetes Since the Recommendation for Hemoglobin A1c Testing.Diabetes Care. 2019 Apr;42(4):576-584. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1726. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Diabetes Care. 2019. PMID: 30728220 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical