Background: Published data on the performance of the new Dade Behring antibody conjugated magnetic immunoassay (ACMIA) for tacrolimus determination are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the results obtained using the ACMIA and Abbott microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), which is the most widely used method for therapeutic tacrolimus monitoring.
Methods: Trough tacrolimus concentrations were determined in 305 blood samples from kidney (n=138) and liver (n=167) transplant recipients using the ACMIA and MEIA immunoassays. The MEIA results were corrected for hematocrit values lesser than 30% and higher than 40% (Hermida et al. Clin Lab 2005; 51: 43-45).
Results: The obtained ACMIA within- and between-run variation coefficients (<10.8%) were acceptable. In the comparison between ACMIA and MEIA results in the blood samples studied, the regression equation was: ACMIA=1.02MEIA+0.29 (r=0.912, p<0.001), with an acceptable difference between the means (8.13+/-0.53 ng/mL vs. 7.62+/-0.50 ng/mL). However, in accordance with the well-established interference of the hematocrit on the MEIA results, a highly significant negative correlation between the MEIA/ACMIA ratio and the hematocrit values was obtained (r=-0.585, p<0.001). When the MEIA results were corrected according to the hematocrit (MEIAHtC), the regression with ACMIA levels was: ACMIA=1.08MEIAHtC-0.09 (r=0.926, p<0.001). This equation was analogous to that obtained between ACMIA and MEIA tacrolimus concentrations in the 164 blood samples with hematocrit of 30-40%.
Conclusions: ACMIA is an acceptable option for therapeutic tacrolimus monitoring, with an important decrease in technician time in relation to the widely used MEIA.