Association between nine quality components and superior worksite health management program results

J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jun;50(6):633-41. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817e7c1c.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the prevalence of "best practice" program components across a select sample of organizations, and to explore differences in engagement rates and health risk reduction between organizations using "best-practice" and "common-practice" health management approaches.

Methods: Using a retrospective approach, researchers assigned organizations to a "best practice" or "common-practice" group based on well-defined criteria. The study examined group differences in employee health assessment participation rates, health coaching program participation and completion rates, and organizational-level health risk reduction.

Results: Best-practice organizations achieved higher levels of engagement than common-practice organizations in both health assessment and health coaching programs. Population-level and intervention-level health risk reduction was 2.35 and 1.08 times higher, respectively, among best-practice organizations compared with common-practice organizations.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the contribution of quality program components to superior program engagement rates and health outcomes.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Benchmarking / methods
  • Benchmarking / organization & administration
  • Efficiency, Organizational / trends
  • Health Promotion / organization & administration*
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Occupational Health Services / organization & administration*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • United States
  • Workplace