Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 161 (1), 76-9

Single-locus Targeting Constructs for Reliable Regulated RNAi and Transgene Expression in Trypanosoma Brucei

Affiliations

Single-locus Targeting Constructs for Reliable Regulated RNAi and Transgene Expression in Trypanosoma Brucei

Sam Alsford et al. Mol Biochem Parasitol.

Abstract

A major obstacle to reproducible expression of recombinant transcripts lies in the epigenetic effects of the flanking chromatin following integration. We previously presented a strategy to overcome this problem in bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei, using a reporter to identify a ribosomal-spacer locus that supports optimal expression and then marking that locus for subsequent targeting. Advantages include elimination of variable-expression position-effects and the easy confirmation of correct integration. We now report a set of validated constructs that exploit this system for expression of dsRNA or recombinant protein. The current construct-set allows expression of intramolecular dsRNA for RNA interference knockdown or expression of proteins that can incorporate c-Myc epitope(s) or a fluorescent-tag for subcellular localisation, interaction and/or other functional analysis. The constructs are integrated at a single, marked locus and deliver reliable and reproducible expression.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic map of single-locus targeting constructs and available cloning sites
Following AscI digestion (cleaves GGCGCGCC), the pRPa constructs have terminal hygΔstop and RRNA spacer sequences for targeting the hygΔstart::PAC::RRNA locus, on chromosome 2a in our 2T1 cells. Correct integration generates an intact HYG ORF and deletes a PAC ORF [11]. Selectable marker (HYG) transcription is then constitutive (PEP: procyclin promoter) and independent of the Tet-regulated cassette (PRRNA: RRNA promoter). All cloning sites indicated are unique and several generate cohesive ends that are compatible with other restriction enzymes. Upper box: Two stem-loop (SL) RNAi constructs are available with different multiple cloning sites (MCS1/2 and MCS3/4). In both cases the ‘loop’ is a 468-bp lacz fragment. We routinely select specific RNAi gene targets (400-600 bp) and primers using the RNAit software [20] http://trypanofan.path.cam.ac.uk/software/RNAit.html. A single pair of PCR primers are designed that incorporate four selected restriction sites (not present in the RNAi target fragment) such that a single PCR product can be differentially digested and sequentially cloned. For example, using MCS1/2, the following primers could be used to clone antisense followed by sense fragments: Primer 1, XbaI-BamHI-5′ sequence; Primer 2, ApaI-KpnI-3′ sequence. The antisense and sense fragments are generated by BamHI-KpnI and XbaI-ApaI digestion respectively. We’ve seen no problems with SL-construct stability or yield using E. coli DH5α. * The ClaI site in MCS3 is blocked by overlapping Dam methylation in DH5αcells. Lower box: Tagging constructs are available for expression of N- or C-terminal fusions with eGFP (G, Clontech) or c-Myc (M, EQKLISEEDL). The tandem 6Myc construct allows assembly of either N- or C-terminal fusions and improved sensitivity. x indicates location of selected ORF. We maintain 2T1 T. brucei cells (Lister 427, MITat1.2, clone 221a), that also express the Tn10 Tet repressor (TetR::BLE::TUB), in HMI-11 growth medium containing phleomycin and puromycin (0.5 μg ml−1 and 0.2 μg ml−1 respectively). We use electroporation (Gene Pulser II, BioRad) with ~2.5 × 107 cells and ~3 μg (yield from one mini-prep, Qiagen) of each AscI-linearised construct in duplicate; each mixture is transferred to 36 ml of medium in a 25 cm2 culture flask. After ~6 h, the appropriate drug selection is applied (2.5 μg ml−1 hygromycin) and cells are distributed into 12- or 24-well plates. Each electroporation experiment typically, and conveniently, yields 2-5 transformed clones using this approach and these are visible after ~5 days (~100,000 cells). To screen clones for simple, double-crossover integration and loss of the PAC gene, we remove ~5% of each day-5, hygR culture and grow with or without puromycin (2 μg ml−1) in a 24-well plate for another 24-48 h. Typically, ~50% of clones are puromycin sensitive and two of these are retained for further analysis. Note that these strains are now resistant to phleomycin (TetR::BLE::TUB) and hygromycin (HYG::RPa::RRNA). Initial analysis normally consists of comparing uninduced and induced (Tet at 1 μg ml−1) cells. For RNAi, this is by counting cell density every 24 h for 3-4 days to generate a growth curve with parallel RNA and/or protein extraction (24 and/or 48 h) for assessment of knockdown by northern and/or western blot depending upon the availability of a suitable antibody. For recombinant protein expression, it is by western blot and/or (immuno)fluorescence analysis after 24 h induction (peak expression is normally seen at this time [10]). Construct maps and sequences, along with further details, are available at http://homepages.lshtm.ac.uk/~ipmbdhor/dhhome.htm (Resources). Further developments and other compatible or complementary constructs will also be documented at this site.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 72 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback