Physicians' views on public reporting of hospital quality data
- PMID: 18596176
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558708319734
Physicians' views on public reporting of hospital quality data
Abstract
This article describes physicians' responses to patient questions and physicians' views about public reports on hospital quality. Interviews with 56 office-based physicians in seven states/regions used hypothetical scenarios of patients questioning referrals based on public reports of hospital quality. Responses were analyzed using an iterative coding process to develop categories and themes from data. Four themes describe physicians' responses to patients: (a) rely on existing physician-patient relationships, (b) acknowledge and consider patient perspectives, (c) take actions to follow up on patient concerns, and (d) provide patients' perspectives on quality reports. Three themes summarize responses to hospital quality reports: perceived lack of methodological rigor, content considerations in reports, and attitudes/experience regarding reports. Findings suggest that physicians take seriously patients' questions about hospital-quality reports and consider changing referral recommendations based on their concerns and/or preferences. Results underscore the importance of efforts by report developers and physician outreach/education to address physicians' methodological concerns.
Similar articles
-
[The 2002 hospital reform--physicians' views].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Sep 6;127(17):2218-21. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007. PMID: 17828313 Norwegian.
-
The ethics of managed care. An initial look at physicians' perspectives.Mark Health Serv. 1997 Fall;17(3):26-39. Mark Health Serv. 1997. PMID: 10173906
-
Medical doctors profile in Ethiopia: production, attrition and retention. In memory of 100-years Ethiopian modern medicine & the new Ethiopian millennium.Ethiop Med J. 2008 Jan;46 Suppl 1:1-77. Ethiop Med J. 2008. PMID: 18709707
-
Physicians' ranking of hospital attributes: a comparison by use group.Health Care Manage Rev. 1989 Summer;14(3):77-84. Health Care Manage Rev. 1989. PMID: 2670837 Review.
-
Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Nov;137-138:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Sep 3. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018. PMID: 30190204 Review.
Cited by
-
Disparate Impacts of Two Public Reporting Initiatives on Clinical and Perceived Quality in Healthcare.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Dec 15;14:5015-5025. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S337596. eCollection 2021. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021. PMID: 34938137 Free PMC article.
-
Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2542-2548. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05267-1. Epub 2019 Aug 28. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31463685 Free PMC article.
-
Facts and Fears in Public Reporting: Patients' Information Needs and Priorities When Selecting a Hospital for Cancer Care.Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):632-641. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19855050. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Med Decis Making. 2019. PMID: 31226909 Free PMC article.
-
Public release of hospital quality data for referral practices in Germany: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Health Econ Rev. 2017 Sep 26;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0171-5. Health Econ Rev. 2017. PMID: 28952136 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners' perceptions of public reporting of institution and individual medicine prescribing data.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1893-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27829429 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
