Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 12 (3), 223-35

Tinnitus Outcomes Assessment

Affiliations

Tinnitus Outcomes Assessment

Mary B Meikle et al. Trends Amplif.

Abstract

Over the past two decades, recognition has grown that measures for evaluating treatment outcomes must be designed specifically to have high responsiveness. With that in mind, four major types of tinnitus measures are reviewed, including psychoacoustic measures, self-report questionnaires concerning functional effects of tinnitus, various rating scales, and global outcome measures. Nine commonly used tinnitus questionnaires, developed in the period 1980-2000, are reviewed. Because of many similarities between tinnitus and pain, comparisons between pain and tinnitus measures are discussed, and recommendations that have been made for developing a core set of measures to evaluate treatment-related changes in pain are presented as providing a fruitful path for developing a core set of measures for tinnitus. Finally, the importance of having both immediately obtainable outcome measures (psychoacoustic, rating scales, or single global measures) and longer term measures (questionnaires covering the negative effects of tinnitus) is emphasized for further work in tinnitus outcomes assessment.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Three commonly used types of rating scales.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Global measure of patient's perception of change following treatment.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 19 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback