Chronic care model and shared care in diabetes: randomized trial of an electronic decision support system
- PMID: 18613991
- DOI: 10.4065/83.7.747
Chronic care model and shared care in diabetes: randomized trial of an electronic decision support system
Erratum in
- Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Oct;83(10):1189
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of a specialist telemedicine intervention for improving diabetes care using the chronic care model (CCM).
Participants and methods: As part of the CCM, 97 primary care physicians at 6 primary care practices in Rochester, MN, referred 639 patients to an on-site diabetes educator between July 1, 2001, and December 31, 2003. On first referral, physicians were centrally randomized to receive a telemedicine intervention (specialty advice and evidence-based messages regarding medication management for cardiovascular risk) or no intervention, keeping outcome assessors and data analysts blinded to group assignment. After each subsequent clinical encounter, endocrinologists reviewed an abstract from the patient's electronic medical record and provided management recommendations and supporting evidence to intervention physicians via e-mail. Control physicians received e-mail with periodic generic information about cardiovascular risk reduction in diabetes. Outcome measures included diabetes care processes (diabetes test completion), outcomes (metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors, estimated coronary artery disease risk), and patient costs (payer perspective).
Results: During the intervention, 951 (70%) of the 1361 endocrinology reviews detected performance gaps and resulted in a message; primary care physicians reported using 49% of messages in patient care. With a mean of 21 months' follow-up, the intervention, compared with control, did not significantly enhance metabolic outcomes or reduce estimated risk of coronary artery disease (adjusted mean difference, -1%; 95% confidence interval, -19% to 17%). The intervention group incurred lower costs (P=.02) but not in diabetes-related costs.
Conclusion: Specialty telemedicine did not significantly enhance the value of CCM in primary care.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00421850.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural telemedicine collaborative care intervention for depression.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;67(8):812-21. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.82. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010. PMID: 20679589 Clinical Trial.
-
Shared electronic vascular risk decision support in primary care: Computerization of Medical Practices for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness (COMPETE III) randomized trial.Arch Intern Med. 2011 Oct 24;171(19):1736-44. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.471. Arch Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22025430 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized trial to improve the quality of treatment for panic and generalized anxiety disorders in primary care.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1332-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1332. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005. PMID: 16330721 Clinical Trial.
-
Improving the Primary Care Consultation for Diabetes and Depression Through Digital Medical Interview Assistant Systems: Narrative Review.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e18109. doi: 10.2196/18109. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32663144 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Critical factors in case management: practical lessons from a cardiac case management program.Dis Manag. 2007 Aug;10(4):197-207. doi: 10.1089/dis.2007.103624. Dis Manag. 2007. PMID: 17718658 Review.
Cited by
-
The effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.SAGE Open Med. 2024 Sep 9;12:20503121241271846. doi: 10.1177/20503121241271846. eCollection 2024. SAGE Open Med. 2024. PMID: 39263639 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3779. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38530311 Free PMC article.
-
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S11-S19. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S001. Diabetes Care. 2024. PMID: 38078573 Review.
-
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37254718 Free PMC article. Review.
-
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Supple 1):S10-S18. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S001. Diabetes Care. 2023. PMID: 36507639 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
