Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct;23(10):1555-60.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0693-y. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

Identification of limited English proficient patients in clinical care

Leah S Karliner  1 , Anna M Napoles-Springer, Dean Schillinger, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Identification of limited English proficient patients in clinical care

Leah S Karliner et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Standardized means to identify patients likely to benefit from language assistance are needed.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the U.S. Census English proficiency question (Census-LEP) in predicting patients' ability to communicate effectively in English.

Design: We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of the Census-LEP alone or in combination with a question on preferred language for medical care for predicting patient-reported ability to discuss symptoms and understand physician recommendations in English.

Participants: Three hundred and two patients > 18 who spoke Spanish and/or English recruited from a cardiology clinic and an inpatient general medical-surgical ward in 2004-2005.

Results: One hundred ninety-eight (66%) participants reported speaking English less than "very well" and 166 (55%) less than "well"; 157 (52%) preferred receiving their medical care in Spanish. Overall, 135 (45%) were able to discuss symptoms and 143 (48%) to understand physician recommendations in English. The Census-LEP with a high-threshold (less than "very well") had the highest sensitivity for predicting effective communication (100% Discuss; 98.7% Understand), but the lowest specificity (72.6% Discuss; 67.1% Understand). The composite measure of Census-LEP and preferred language for medical care provided a significant increase in specificity (91.9% Discuss; 83.9% Understand), with only a marginal decrease in sensitivity (99.4% Discuss; 96.7% Understand).

Conclusions: Using the Census-LEP item with a high-threshold of less than "very well" as a screening question, followed by a language preference for medical care question, is recommended for inclusive and accurate identification of patients likely to benefit from language assistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Algorithm for determining likely benefit from language assistance.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Shin H, Bruno R. Language Use and English-Speaking Ability; 2000. http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-29.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2008.
    1. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Ability to Speak English; 2000. Census 2000 summary File 3(SF3) - Sample Data http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/lang_use.html Accessed May 23, 2008.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1797091', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1797091/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16899021', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16899021/'}]}
    2. Hasnain-Wynia R, Baker DW. Obtaining data on patient race, ethnicity, and primary language in health care organizations: current challenges and proposed solutions. Health Serv Res. 2006;41(4 Pt 1):1501–1518. - PMC - PubMed
    1. JCAHO. Joint commission 2006 Requirements Related to the Provision of Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Health Care: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 2006.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.354', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.354'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15757919', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15757919/'}]}
    2. Lurie N, Jung M, Lavizzo-Mourey R. Disparities and quality improvement: federal policy levers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(2):354–364, Mar-Apr. - PubMed

Publication types