Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 100 (Pt 2), 283-312

Comparing Different Approach and Avoidance Models of Learning and Personality in the Prediction of Work, University, and Leadership Outcomes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing Different Approach and Avoidance Models of Learning and Personality in the Prediction of Work, University, and Leadership Outcomes

Chris J Jackson et al. Br J Psychol.

Abstract

Jackson (2005) developed a hybrid model of personality and learning, known as the learning styles profiler (LSP) which was designed to span biological, socio-cognitive, and experiential research foci of personality and learning research. The hybrid model argues that functional and dysfunctional learning outcomes can be best understood in terms of how cognitions and experiences control, discipline, and re-express the biologically based scale of sensation-seeking. In two studies with part-time workers undertaking tertiary education (N = 137 and 58), established models of approach and avoidance from each of the three different research foci were compared with Jackson's hybrid model in their predictiveness of leadership, work, and university outcomes using self-report and supervisor ratings. Results showed that the hybrid model was generally optimal and, as hypothesized, that goal orientation was a mediator of sensation-seeking on outcomes (work performance, university performance, leader behaviours, and counterproductive work behaviour). Our studies suggest that the hybrid model has considerable promise as a predictor of work and educational outcomes as well as dysfunctional outcomes.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 PubMed Central articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback