Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
- PMID: 18635432
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0800310
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 31;359(5): 546
Abstract
Background: In the English pay-for-performance program, physicians use a range of criteria to exclude individual patients from the quality calculations that determine their pay. This process, which is called exception reporting, is intended to safeguard patients against inappropriate treatment by physicians seeking to maximize their income. However, exception reporting may allow physicians to inappropriately exclude patients for whom targets have been missed (a practice known as gaming).
Methods: We analyzed data extracted automatically from clinical computing systems for 8105 family practices in England (96% of all practices), data from the U.K. Census, and data on practice characteristics from the U.K. Department of Health. We determined the rate of exception reporting for 65 clinical activities and the association between this rate and the characteristics of patients and medical practices.
Results: From April 2005 through March 2006, physicians excluded a median of 5.3% of patients (interquartile range, 4.0 to 6.9) from the quality calculations. Physicians were most likely to exclude patients from indicators that were related to providing treatments and achieving target levels of intermediate outcomes; they were least likely to exclude patients from indicators that were related to routine checks and measurements and to offers of treatment. The characteristics of patients and practices explained only 2.7% of the variance in exception reporting. We estimate that exception reporting accounted for approximately 1.5% of the cost of the pay-for-performance program.
Conclusions: Exception reporting brings substantial benefits to pay-for-performance programs, providing that the process is used appropriately. In England, rates of exception reporting have generally been low, with little evidence of widespread gaming.
2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Pay-for-performance system for English physicians.N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2176-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc081751. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 19005204 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 27;355(4):375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa055505. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16870916
-
"Mind the gap!" Evaluation of the performance gap attributable to exception reporting and target thresholds in the new GMS contract: National database analysis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun 17;8:131. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-131. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 18559086 Free PMC article.
-
Pay-for-performance system for English physicians.N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2176-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc081751. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 19005204 No abstract available.
-
Use of the health plan employer data and information set for measuring and improving the quality of asthma care.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Sep;97(3):298-305. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60793-4. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006. PMID: 17042134 Review.
-
Pay for performance in orthopaedic surgery.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Apr;457:87-95. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180399418. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007. PMID: 17290153 Review.
Cited by
-
The evidence gap on gendered impacts of performance-based financing among family physicians for chronic disease care: a systematic review reanalysis in contexts of single-payer universal coverage.Hum Resour Health. 2020 Sep 22;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00512-9. Hum Resour Health. 2020. PMID: 32962707 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: a longitudinal study.Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;68(677):e811-e818. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699797. Epub 2018 Nov 5. Br J Gen Pract. 2018. PMID: 30397016 Free PMC article.
-
Design and effects of outcome-based payment models in healthcare: a systematic review.Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):217-232. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0989-8. Epub 2018 Jul 5. Eur J Health Econ. 2019. PMID: 29974285 Free PMC article.
-
Changing Intensivists' Behaviors: A Challenge in Need of New Solutions.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul 1;196(1):2-4. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0020ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28665202 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Incentivised chronic disease management and the inverse equity hypothesis: findings from a longitudinal analysis of Scottish primary care practice-level data.BMC Med. 2017 Apr 11;15(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0833-5. BMC Med. 2017. PMID: 28395660 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous