Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct;23(10):1659-65.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0736-4. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

Patient assessments of the most important medical decision during a hospitalization

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patient assessments of the most important medical decision during a hospitalization

Thomas V Perneger et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Background: How medical decisions are made in real-life situations is largely unexplored. We explored patients' perceptions of decision-making during a hospitalization and examined the conformity of the decision process with expert recommendations.

Objective: To describe the conformity of the decision-making process with current expert opinion and examine the associations between various aspects of the decision-making process and a global assessment of the decision.

Methods: Mail survey of patients discharged from a teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients identified the main medical decision during their stay, and rated the decision process (11-item "decision process score") and their satisfaction with the decision (five-item "decision satisfaction score"). Both scores were scaled between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).

Participants: The survey had 1467 respondents.

Main results: In total 862 (58.8%) of 1467 respondents reported having made a medical decision while in the hospital. The decision process score (mean 78.5, SD 21.5) and the decision satisfaction score (mean 86.5, SD 20.4) were moderately correlated (r = 0.62). Men, healthier patients, patients discharged from the department of surgery, and those who reported sharing the decision with their doctor gave the highest ratings on both scales. Five process variables were independently associated with high satisfaction with the decision: the doctor explained all possible treatments and examinations, the patient was aware of risks at the time of the decision, the doctor's explanations were easy to understand, the patient was involved in the decision as much as desired or more, and the patient was not pressured into the decision.

Conclusions: A majority of patients discharged from a general hospital were able to identify and rate a medical decision. Recommended features of the process of medical decision-making were associated with greater satisfaction with the decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean decision process (dark gray) and decision satisfaction (light gray) scores, across the patient’s perception of who made the decision. Differences between groups globally significant for both scores (ANOVA: -value <0.001). Post hoc comparisons for decision process score: mean of “doctor alone” significantly lower than all others, and “mostly doctor” significantly lower than “mostly patient” and “patient alone”. For the decision satisfaction score, means of “doctor alone” and “mostly doctor” significantly lower than”mostly patient” and “patient alone”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00145-8', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10452420', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10452420/'}]}
    2. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.275.2.152', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.275.2.152'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '0', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/0/'}]}
    2. Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996;275:152–6. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16442453', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16442453/'}]}
    2. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:102–114. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-8', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00059-8'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9681902', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9681902/'}]}
    2. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:329–39. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16103473', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16103473/'}]}
    2. Woolf SH, Chan ECY, Harris R, Sheridan SL, Braddock CH, Kaplan RM, Krist A, O’Connor A, Tunis S. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:293–300. - PubMed

Publication types