Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul-Aug;34(4):655-63.
doi: 10.1177/0145721708320903.

Use of a uniform treatment algorithm abolishes racial disparities in glycemic control

Affiliations

Use of a uniform treatment algorithm abolishes racial disparities in glycemic control

Mary K Rhee et al. Diabetes Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare glycemic control between blacks and whites in a setting where patient and provider behavior is assessed, and where a uniform treatment algorithm is used to guide care.

Methods: This observational cohort study was conducted in 3542 patients (3324 blacks, 218 whites) with type 2 diabetes with first and 1-year follow-up visits to a municipal diabetes clinic; a subset had 2-year follow-up. Patient adherence and provider management were determined. The primary endpoint was A1c.

Results: At presentation, A1c was higher in blacks than whites (8.9% vs 8.3%; P < .001), even after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. During 1 year of follow-up, patient adherence to scheduled visits and medications was comparable in both groups, and providers intensified medications with comparable frequency and amount. After 1 year, A1c differences decreased but remained significant (7.7% vs 7.3%; P = .029), even in multivariable analysis (P = .003). However, after 2 years, A1c differences were no longer observed by univariate (7.6% vs 7.5%; P = .51) or multi-variable analysis (P = .18).

Conclusions: Blacks have higher A1c than whites at presentation, but differences narrow after 1 year and disappear after 2 years of care in a setting where patient and provider behavior are comparable and that emphasizes uniform intensification of therapy. Presumably, racial disparities at presentation reflected prior inequalities in management. Use of uniform care algorithms nationwide should help to reduce disparities in diabetes outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A1c at presentation, 1-year and 2-year follow-up stratified by race. A, A1c at presentation and after 1 year of care (n = 3542). *P < .001 for A1c difference between blacks and whites; P = .029 for A1c difference between blacks and whites. B, A1c at presentation, after 1 year of care, and after 2 years of care in patients who returned for 2-year follow-up visits (n = 1795). **P = .029 for A1c difference between blacks and whites.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2005. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2005.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2008.
    1. 1999 Diabetes Surveillance Report. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/survl99/index.htm. Accessed March 3, 2005.
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–986. - PubMed
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–853. - PubMed
    1. Harris MI, Eastman RC, Cowie C, Flegal K, Eberhardt MS. Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(3):403–408. - PubMed

Publication types