Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 18678846
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00009
Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin cancer in men in the United States, and prostate cancer screening has increased in recent years. In 2002, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded that evidence was insufficient to recommend for or against screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.
Purpose: To examine new evidence on benefits and harms of screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer with PSA.
Data sources: English-language articles identified in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (search dates, January 2002 to July 2007), reference lists of retrieved articles, and expert suggestions.
Study selection: Randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses of PSA screening and cross-sectional and cohort studies of screening harms and of the natural history of screening-detected cancer were selected to answer the following questions: Does screening for prostate cancer with PSA, as a single-threshold test or as a function of multiple tests over time, decrease morbidity or mortality? What are the magnitude and nature of harms associated with prostate cancer screening, other than overtreatment? What is the natural history of PSA-detected, nonpalpable, localized prostate cancer?
Data extraction: Studies were reviewed, abstracted, and rated for quality by using predefined U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria.
Data synthesis: No good-quality randomized, controlled trials of screening for prostate cancer have been completed. In 1 cross-sectional and 2 prospective cohort studies of fair to good quality, false-positive PSA screening results caused psychological adverse effects for up to 1 year after the test. The natural history of PSA-detected prostate cancer is poorly understood.
Limitations: Few eligible studies were identified. Long-term adverse effects of false-positive PSA screening test results are unknown.
Conclusion: Prostate-specific antigen screening is associated with psychological harms, and its potential benefits remain uncertain.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen testing: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):I37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18678840 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug. Report No.: 08-05121-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug. Report No.: 08-05121-EF-1. PMID: 20722160 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):185-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18678845
-
Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1914-1931. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3712. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29801018 Review.
-
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29801017
-
Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 6;155(11):762-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-11-201112060-00375. Epub 2011 Oct 7. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21984740 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen With Age, Digital Rectal Examination, and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in the Lebanese Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus. 2024 Aug 16;16(8):e66991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66991. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39280568 Free PMC article.
-
Spatio-temporal variation in prostate cancer testing in Stockholm: A population-based study.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0308254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308254. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39146336 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of prostate cancer in Medicaid beneficiaries with and without HIV in 2001-2015 in 14 states.AIDS Care. 2024 Nov;36(11):1657-1667. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2024.2383875. Epub 2024 Jul 30. AIDS Care. 2024. PMID: 39079500
-
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based multivariate model for highly accurate and noninvasive diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in the PSA gray zone.Cancer Imaging. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00562-x. Cancer Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37667341 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Trends in Biosensing and Diagnostic Methods for Novel Cancer Biomarkers.Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 18;13(3):398. doi: 10.3390/bios13030398. Biosensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36979610 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous