In this paper we argue that the human form should be seen to exist, in a longitudinal way, throughout the continuum of human growth and development. This entails that the moral value of that form, which we link analytically to the adult, interacting, social and rational being, attaches to all phases of human life to some extent. Having established this we discuss the consequences it has for the moral status of the human embryo. We then apply this argument, and the resulting moral status, to the area of reproductive technology. In doing this we show that there are certain regulations and controls which ought to apply to the use of these infertility treatments.
PIP: The human form exists in a longitudinal way in a continuum of human growth and development. The moral value of this form, which is intrinsic, links the embryo with the rationally, social and morally active adult. The argument has certain consequences for human embryos. The relative sanctity of human life is thus established. Therefore to do harm to human life does harm a basic moral principle. This sanctity is attached to the whole human form, including embryos. The result is that when dealing with embryos, one must realize one is dealing with human life. And often this life must be balanced against the value of another human life. This argument provides excellent defense from moral arguments that attempt to label embryo research as immoral. Researchers must understand that they are dealing with human life and once this is admitted it is simply a matter of valuing the life accordingly.