Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec 22;275(1653):2787-91.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0787.

Duration and outcome of intergroup conflict influences intragroup affiliative behaviour

Affiliations

Duration and outcome of intergroup conflict influences intragroup affiliative behaviour

Andrew N Radford. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Theoreticians have long suggested that the amount of intergroup conflict in which a group is involved could influence the level of cooperation or affiliation displayed by its members. Despite the prevalence of intergroup conflicts in many social animal species, however, few empirical studies have investigated this potential link. Here, I show that intragroup allopreening rates are highest in green woodhoopoe (Phoeniculus purpureus) groups that have the greatest involvement in intergroup conflict. One reason for this relationship is a post-conflict increase in allopreening, and I demonstrate for the first time that both conflict duration and outcome influence subsequent allopreening rates: group members allopreened more following long conflicts and those they lost compared with short conflicts and those they won, perhaps because the former are more stressful. The increase in affiliative behaviour was the result of more allopreening of subordinate helpers by the dominant breeding pair, which may be because the breeders are trying to encourage helpers to participate in future conflicts; relative group size influences conflict outcome and helpers contribute more to conflicts than do the breeding pair. These results emphasize that our understanding of cooperation and group dynamics can be enhanced by investigations of how intergroup interactions affect intragroup processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intragroup body allopreening rates of 12 green woodhoopoe groups in relation to the proportion of observation time involved in intergroup conflict. Least-squares regression line is shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intragroup body allopreening rates of 12 green woodhoopoe groups following different intergroup conflicts. Least-squares regression lines are shown: won conflicts (dashed line, diamonds) and lost conflicts (solid line, squares).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (±s.e.m.) post-conflict changes in body allopreening (a) donation and (b) receipt rate for green woodhoopoe individuals of different dominance status (n=20 dominant breeders (white bars), 16 subordinate helpers (grey bars)) in 10 groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander R.D, Borgia G. Group selection, altruism and the levels of organisation of life. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1978;9:449–474. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.002313 - DOI
    1. Aureli F, Preston S.D, de Waal F.B.M. Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. J. Comp. Psychol. 1999;113:59–65. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.59 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aureli F, Cords M, van Schaik C.P. Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. Anim. Behav. 2002;64:325–343. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3071 - DOI
    1. Barrett L, Henzi S.P, Weingrill T, Lycett J.E, Hill R.A. Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1999;266:665–670. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0687 - DOI
    1. Cant M.A, Otali E, Mwanguhya F. Fighting and mating between groups in a cooperatively breeding mammal, the banded mongoose. Ethology. 2002;108:541–555. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00795.x - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources