Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 18780847
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181
Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Context: The increasing use of Internet-based learning in health professions education may be informed by a timely, comprehensive synthesis of evidence of effectiveness.
Objectives: To summarize the effect of Internet-based instruction for health professions learners compared with no intervention and with non-Internet interventions.
Data sources: Systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, TimeLit, Web of Science, Dissertation Abstracts, and the University of Toronto Research and Development Resource Base from 1990 through 2007.
Study selection: Studies in any language quantifying the association of Internet-based instruction and educational outcomes for practicing and student physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dentists, and other health care professionals compared with a no-intervention or non-Internet control group or a preintervention assessment.
Data extraction: Two reviewers independently evaluated study quality and abstracted information including characteristics of learners, learning setting, and intervention (including level of interactivity, practice exercises, online discussion, and duration).
Data synthesis: There were 201 eligible studies. Heterogeneity in results across studies was large (I(2) > or = 79%) in all analyses. Effect sizes were pooled using a random effects model. The pooled effect size in comparison to no intervention favored Internet-based interventions and was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.10; P < .001; n = 126 studies) for knowledge outcomes, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.49-1.20; P < .001; n = 16) for skills, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-1.02; P < .001; n = 32) for learner behaviors and patient effects. Compared with non-Internet formats, the pooled effect sizes (positive numbers favoring Internet) were 0.10 (95% CI, -0.12 to 0.32; P = .37; n = 43) for satisfaction, 0.12 (95% CI, 0.003 to 0.24; P = .045; n = 63) for knowledge, 0.09 (95% CI, -0.26 to 0.44; P = .61; n = 12) for skills, and 0.51 (95% CI, -0.24 to 1.25; P = .18; n = 6) for behaviors or patient effects. No important treatment-subgroup interactions were identified.
Conclusions: Internet-based learning is associated with large positive effects compared with no intervention. In contrast, effects compared with non-Internet instructional methods are heterogeneous and generally small, suggesting effectiveness similar to traditional methods. Future research should directly compare different Internet-based interventions.
Comment in
-
Internet-based education for health professionals.JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):598-9; author reply 599-600. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.69. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19211463 No abstract available.
-
Internet-based education for health professionals.JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):599; author reply 599-600. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.70. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19211464 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):909-22. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c319. Acad Med. 2010. PMID: 20520049 Review.
-
Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):978-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1234. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21900138 Review.
-
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447007
-
Time and learning efficiency in Internet-based learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Dec;15(5):755-70. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9231-x. Epub 2010 May 14. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010. PMID: 20467807 Review.
-
The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 4;18(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4807. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 26729058 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Extended Reality in Neurosurgical Education: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 14;22(16):6067. doi: 10.3390/s22166067. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36015828 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Virtual Classrooms and Their Challenge of Interaction-An Evaluation of Chat Activities and Logs in an Online Course about Digital Medicine with Heterogeneous Participants.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10184. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610184. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36011818 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of e-Learning Systems on Motivating Students and Enhancing Their Outcomes During COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Approach.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 29;13:874181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874181. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35967714 Free PMC article.
-
Learning gain in web (internet) sourced seminars versus textbook sourced seminars in postgraduate medical students.J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jun 11;11:162. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1263_21. eCollection 2022. J Educ Health Promot. 2022. PMID: 35847146 Free PMC article.
-
Fluid and electrolyte management: increasing the knowledge of House Officers using an interactive eLearning tool.Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Jul 13. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03074-y. Online ahead of print. Ir J Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35831766
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
