The silent risks of blood transfusion

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Oct;21(5):664-8. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32830f1fd1.


Purpose of review: Clinical research has identified blood transfusion as an independent risk factor for immediate and long-term adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, infection and malignancy. New findings have called into question the traditional assumptions clinicians utilize in evaluating the risks and benefits of blood transfusion. Appreciation of newly recognized risks is important for conserving scarce resources and optimizing patient outcomes.

Recent findings: Recent clinical outcomes research has examined the impact of blood transfusion on critically ill patients, trauma patients, patients undergoing cardiac surgery, patients experiencing acute coronary syndromes, oncology patients and others. These studies provide additional evidence of adverse outcomes associated with blood transfusion in a wide variety of clinical contexts.

Summary: The benefits of blood transfusion have never been conclusively demonstrated, but evidence of transfusion-related harm continues to accumulate. Given the transfusion triggers that currently predominate in clinical practice it appears that clinical outcomes could improve significantly with more widespread adoption of restrictive transfusion strategies.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anemia / therapy
  • Blood Preservation
  • Blood Transfusion / mortality
  • Critical Care*
  • Critical Illness / therapy
  • Drug Storage / standards
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Heart Diseases / therapy
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors
  • Transfusion Reaction*
  • Wounds and Injuries / therapy