Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;29(12):2128-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

The different effects of structurally related sulfakinins on Drosophila melanogaster odor preference and locomotion suggest involvement of distinct mechanisms

Affiliations

The different effects of structurally related sulfakinins on Drosophila melanogaster odor preference and locomotion suggest involvement of distinct mechanisms

Ruthann Nichols et al. Peptides. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Sulfakinins are myoactive peptides and antifeedant factors. Naturally occurring drosulfakinin I (DSK I; FDDYGHMRFNH(2)) and drosulfakinin II (DSK II; GGDDQFDDYGHMRFNH(2)) contain sulfated or nonsulfated tyrosine. We discovered sDSK II and nsDSK II influenced Drosophila melanogaster larval odor preference. However, sDSK I, nsDSK I, MRFNH(2), and saline did not influence odor preference. We discovered sDSK I and nsDSK I influenced larval locomotion. However, sDSK II, nsDSK II, MRFNH(2), and saline did not influence locomotion. Our novel data suggest distinct mechanisms underlie the effects of DSK I and DSK II peptides on odor preference and locomotion, parameters important to many facets of animal survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1A
Fig 1A
The effect of saline on odor preference; BuOH odorant. The number of animals (y-axis) and the zone in which they spent a plurality of time (x axis). The left zone reservoir contained butanol (BuOH), the central or neutral zone contained no reservoir (unlabeled), and the right zone reservoir contained water (H2O). The number of animals analyzed was n = 60.
Fig 1B
Fig 1B
The effect of saline on odor preference; Ac odorant. The number of animals (y-axis) and the zone in which they spent a plurality of time (x-axis). The left zone reservoir contained acetate (Ac), the central or neutral zone contained no reservoir (unlabeled), and the right zone reservoir contained water (H2O). The number of animals analyzed was n = 60.
Fig 1C
Fig 1C
The effect of saline on odor preference; Ac and BuOH odorants. The number of animals (y-axis) and the zone in which they spent a plurality of time (x-axis). The left zone reservoir contained acetate (Ac), the central or neutral zone contained no reservoir (unlabeled), and the right zone reservoir contained butanol (BuOH). The number of animals analyzed was n = 60.
Fig 2A
Fig 2A
The effects of saline and MRFNH2 on odor preference; BuOH odorant. PREF (y axis) equals (# animals in left zone - # animals in right zone)/(total # of animals). The left zone reservoir contained butanol (BuOH) and the right zone reservoir contained water (H2O); x axis. The number of animals analyzed was n = 120 (saline) and n = 113 (MRFNH2).
Fig 2B
Fig 2B
The effects of saline and MRFNH2 on odor preference; Ac odorant. PREF (y axis) equals (# animals in left zone - # animals in right zone)/(total # of animals). The left zone reservoir contained acetate (Ac) and the right zone reservoir contained water (H2O); x axis. The number of animals analyzed was n = 120 (saline) and n = 112 (MRFNH2).
Fig 2C
Fig 2C
The effects of saline and MRFNH2 on odor preference; Ac and BuOH odorants. PREF (y axis) equals (# animals in left zone - # animals in right zone)/(total # of animals). The left zone reservoir contained acetate (Ac) and the right zone reservoir contained butanol (BuOH); x axis. The number of animals analyzed were n = 123 (saline) and n = 111 (MRFNH2).
Fig 3A
Fig 3A
The effects of saline and sulfakinins on odor preference; BuOH odorant. A positive PREF index (y axis) indicates animals preferred the odor in the left reservoir butanol (BuOH) compared to the right reservoir water (H2O) in response to the injectant; x axis. Data represent ≥110 larvae assayed for each injectant. Error bars represent % error. An asterisk (*) denotes sulfakinin odor preference data statistically significant compared to saline (p ≤ 0.02).
Fig 3B
Fig 3B
The effects of saline and sulfakinins on odor preference; Ac odorant. A positive PREF index (y axis) indicates animals preferred the odor in the left reservoir acetate (Ac) compared to the right reservoir water (H2O), in response to the injectant; x axis. Data represent ≥100 larvae assayed for each injectant. Error bars represent % error. No sulfakinin odor preference data were statistically significant compared to saline (p ≤ 0.02).
Fig 3C
Fig 3C
The effects of saline and sulfakinins on odor preference; Ac and BuOH odorants. A positive PREF indicates a systematic preference for the left odorant (Ac); negative PREF indicates a systematic preference for the right odorant (BuOH). Data represent ≥110 larvae assayed for each injectant. Error bars represent % error. An asterisk (*) denotes significant compared to saline (p ≤ 0.02).
Fig 4
Fig 4
The effects of saline and sulfakinins on locomotion. Results displayed as number of lines crossed in 5 minutes. Data represent ≥29 larvae assayed for each injectant. Asterisks represent effects statistically different from saline with p values < 0.001. Error bars represent standard error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barbaz BS, Autry WL, Ambrose FG, Hall NR, Liebman JM. Antinociceptive profile of sulfated CCK-8. Comparison with CCK-4, unsulfated CCK-8 and other neuropeptides. Neuropharmacology. 1986;25:823–29. - PubMed
    1. Berg BG, Schachtner J, Utz S, Homberg U. Distribution of neuropeptides in the primary olfactory center of the heliothine moth Heliothis virescens. Cell Tiss Res. 2007;327:385–98. - PubMed
    1. Bonetto V, Jörnvall H, Andersson M, Renlund S, Mutt V, Sillard R. Isolation and characterization of sulphated and nonsulphated forms of cholecystokinin-58 and their action on gallbladder contraction. Eur J Biochem. 1990;264:336–40. - PubMed
    1. Brody T, Cravchik A. Drosophila melanogaster G protein-coupled receptors. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:F83–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrasco M, Del Rio M, Hernanz A, De la Fuente M. Inhibition of human neutrophil functions by sulfated and nonsulfated cholecystokinin octapeptides. Peptides. 1997;18:415–22. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources