Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct;17(8):1321-9.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0591.

Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among disabled women aged 40-75: does quality of the experience matter?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among disabled women aged 40-75: does quality of the experience matter?

Sze Y Liu et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Women with disabilities (WWD) face significant barriers accessing healthcare, which may affect rates of routine preventive services. We examined the relationship between disability status and routine breast and cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older unmarried women and the differences in reported quality of the screening experience.

Methods: Data were from a 2003-2005 cross-sectional survey of 630 unmarried women in Rhode Island, 40-75 years of age, stratified by marital status (previously vs. never married) and partner gender (women who partner with men exclusively [WPM] vs. women who partner with women exclusively or with both women and men [WPW]).

Results: WWD were more likely than those without a disability to be older, have a high school education or less, have household incomes <$30,000, be unemployed, and identify as nonwhite. In addition, WWD were less likely to report having the mammogram or Pap test procedure explained and more likely to report that the procedures were difficult to perform. After adjustment for important demographic characteristics, we found no differences in cancer screening behaviors by disability status. However, the quality of the cancer screening experience was consistently and significantly associated with likelihood of routine cancer screening.

Conclusions: Higher quality of cancer screening experience was significantly associated with likelihood of having routine breast and cervical cancer screening. Further studies should explore factors that affect quality of the screening experience, including facility characteristics and interactions with medical staff.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Reasons for putting off or avoiding cancer screening by self-reported disability status, Cancer Screening Project for Women, 2003–2005.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Proportion of women reporting specific indicators of quality of cancer screening experience, by disability status and type of screening, Cancer Screening Project for Women, 2003–2005.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Waldrop J. Stern SM. Disability status: 2000. Census 2000 brief. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau. 2003
    1. Verbrugge LM. Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1–14. - PubMed
    1. Nosek MA. Young ME. Rintala DH. Howland BA. Foley CC. Bennett JL. Barriers to reproductive health maintenance among women with physical disabilities. J Womens Health. 1995;4:505–518.
    1. Becker H. Stuifbergen A. Tinkle M. Reproductive health care experiences of women with physical disabilities: A qualitative study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(Suppl):S-26. - PubMed
    1. Nosek MA. Howland CA. Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78((Suppl)):S-39. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms