Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes
- PMID: 18794553
- PMCID: PMC4762020
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-8-200810210-00242
Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes
Abstract
Background: Evidence comparing premixed insulin analogues (a mixture of rapid-acting and intermediate-acting insulin analogues) with other antidiabetic agents is urgently required to guide appropriate therapy.
Purpose: To summarize the English-language literature on the effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues compared with other antidiabetic agents in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Data sources: The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 2008 and sought unpublished data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, and industry.
Study selection: Studies with control groups that compared premixed insulin analogues with another antidiabetic medication in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Data extraction: 2 reviewers using standardized protocols performed serial abstraction.
Data synthesis: Evidence from clinical trials was inconclusive for clinical outcomes, such as mortality. Therefore, the review focused on intermediate outcomes. Premixed insulin analogues were similar to premixed human insulin in decreasing fasting glucose levels, hemoglobin A(1c) levels, and the incidence of hypoglycemia but were more effective in decreasing postprandial glucose levels (mean difference, -1.1 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.7 mmol/L [-19.2 mg/dL; 95% CI, -25.9 to -12.5 mg/dL]). Compared with long-acting insulin analogues, premixed insulin analogues were superior in decreasing postprandial glucose levels (mean difference, -1.5 mmol/L; CI, -1.9 to -1.2 mmol/L [-27.9 mg/dL; CI, -34.3 to -21.5 mg/dL]) and hemoglobin A(1c) levels (mean difference, -0.39% [CI, -0.50% to -0.28%]) but were inferior in decreasing fasting glucose levels (mean difference, 0.7 mmol/L; CI, 0.3 to 1.0 mmol/L [12.0 mg/dL; CI, 6.0 to 18.1 mg/dL]) and were associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycemia. Compared with noninsulin antidiabetic agents, premixed insulin analogues were more effective in decreasing fasting glucose levels (mean difference, -1.1 mmol/L; CI, -1.7 to -0.6 mmol/L [-20.5 mg/dL; CI, -29.9 to -11.2 mg/dL]), postprandial glucose levels (mean difference, -2.1 mmol/L; CI, -3.4 to -0.8 mmol/L [-37.4 mg/dL; CI, -61.0 to -13.7 mg/dL]), and hemoglobin A(1c) levels (mean difference, -0.49% [CI, -0.86% to -0.12%]) but were associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycemia.
Limitations: The literature search was restricted to studies published in English. Data on clinical outcomes were limited. The small number of studies for each comparison limited assessment of between-study heterogeneity.
Conclusion: Premixed insulin analogues provide glycemic control similar to that of premixed human insulin and may provide tighter glycemic control than long-acting insulin analogues and noninsulin antidiabetic agents.
Figures
Comment in
-
Newer insulins in search of a niche.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 21;149(8):586-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-8-200810210-00011. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18936506 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Mealtime 50/50 basal + prandial insulin analogue mixture with a basal insulin analogue, both plus metformin, in the achievement of target HbA1c and pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multinational, 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison.Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2349-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.016. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18158076 Clinical Trial.
-
Addition of neutral protamine lispro insulin or insulin glargine to oral type 2 diabetes regimens for patients with suboptimal glycemic control: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 21;149(8):531-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-8-200810210-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18936501 Clinical Trial.
-
AHRQ's comparative effectiveness research on premixed insulin analogues for adults with type 2 diabetes: understanding and applying the systematic review findings.J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Apr;17(3 Suppl):S3-19. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.s9-b.S03. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011. PMID: 21476781 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prandial premixed insulin analogue regimens versus basal insulin analogue regimens in the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based comparison.Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6 Pt 1):1254-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.003. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18036388 Review.
-
Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Feb;55(2):182-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01043.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007. PMID: 17302653 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Human Insulin as an Antidote to the High Cost of Insulin: Clinical Insignificance of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Differences.Clin Diabetes. 2023 Summer;41(3):438-441. doi: 10.2337/cd22-0106. Epub 2023 Mar 6. Clin Diabetes. 2023. PMID: 37456099 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Impact of Medical Nutritional Therapy on the Efficacy of Premix Insulin in Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Mater Sociomed. 2023 Mar;35(1):13-17. doi: 10.5455/msm.2023.35.13-17. Mater Sociomed. 2023. PMID: 37095879 Free PMC article.
-
Basal Insulin Reduces Glucose Variability and Hypoglycaemia Compared to Premixed Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Study Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 27;13:791439. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.791439. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35574003 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of premixed insulin to achieve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective UK cohort study.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Apr;23(4):929-937. doi: 10.1111/dom.14298. Epub 2021 Jan 26. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021. PMID: 33319424 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual Differences in response to Mid- or Low-Premixed Insulin Analogue in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.J Diabetes Res. 2020 Feb 7;2020:8152640. doi: 10.1155/2020/8152640. eCollection 2020. J Diabetes Res. 2020. PMID: 32090123 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2005. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: U.S.: 2005.
-
- Gregg EW, Cadwell BL, Cheng YJ, Cowie CC, Williams DE, Geiss L, et al. Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2806–12. - PubMed
-
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352:837–53. - PubMed
-
- Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. - PubMed
-
- Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connel D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2007. [accessed on August 4, 2008]. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm Available online at.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical