Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov;23(11):1809-14.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0785-8. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

Screening, treatment, and prostate cancer mortality in the Seattle area and Connecticut: fifteen-year follow-up

Affiliations

Screening, treatment, and prostate cancer mortality in the Seattle area and Connecticut: fifteen-year follow-up

Grace Lu-Yao et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Prior to introduction of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, the Seattle-Puget Sound and Connecticut Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas had similar prostate cancer mortality rates. Early in the PSA era (1987-1990), men in the Seattle area were screened and treated more intensively for prostate cancer than men in Connecticut.

Objective: We previously reported more intensive screening and treatment early in the PSA era did not lower prostate cancer mortality through 11 years and now extend follow-up to 15 years.

Design: Natural experiment comparing two fixed population-based cohorts.

Subjects: Male Medicare beneficiaries ages 65-79 from the Seattle (N = 94,900) and Connecticut (N = 120,621) SEER areas, followed from 1987-2001.

Measurements: Rates of prostate cancer screening; treatment with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy; and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Main results: The 15-year cumulative incidences of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy through 2001 were 2.84% and 6.02%, respectively, for Seattle cohort members, compared to 0.56% and 5.07% for Connecticut cohort members (odds ratio 5.20, 95% confidence interval 3.22 to 8.42 for surgery and odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.58 for radiation). The cumulative incidence of androgen deprivation therapy from 1991-2001 was 4.78% for Seattle compared to 6.13% for Connecticut (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.87). The adjusted rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality through 2001 was 1.02 (95% C.I. 0.96 to 1.09) in Seattle versus Connecticut.

Conclusion: Among men aged 65 or older, more intensive prostate cancer screening early in the PSA era and more intensive treatment particularly with radical prostatectomy over 15 years of follow-up were not associated with lower prostate cancer-specific mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative incidence of prostate cancer by study region.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Age adjusted prostate cancer mortality per 100,000 person-years for men in the Seattle–Puget Sound region and Connecticut on the basis of cross-sectional data, 1987-2001, adjusted to the age composition of the entire study cohort: 48.3% aged 70-74, 33.3% aged 75-79, 18.4% aged 80-84 as of 1 January 1992. (US data by SEER region, age, and race provided by LAG Ries, Cancer Statistics Branch, National Cancer Institute).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. None
    2. Ries L, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2003. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; ; 2006.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1093/jnci/91.12.1017', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.12.1017'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10379964', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10379964/'}]}
    2. Hankey B, Feuer E, Clegg L, et al. Cancer surveillance series: Interpreting trends in prostate cancer - Part I: Evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1017–24. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1093/jnci/91.12.1025', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.12.1025'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10379965', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10379965/'}]}
    2. Feuer E, Merrill R, Hankey B. Cancer surveillance series: Interpreting trends in prostate cancer - Part II: Cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1025–32. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12096083', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12096083/'}]}
    2. Etzioni R, Penson DF, Legler JM, et al. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:981–90. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1093/aje/kwh336', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh336'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15561985', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15561985/'}]}
    2. Shaw P, Etzioni R, Zeliadt S, et al. An ecologic study of prostate-specific antigen screening and prostate cancer mortality in nine geographic areas of the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160:1059–69. - PubMed

Publication types