Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Sep 18;8:52.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-52.

Patient Satisfaction and Side Effects in Primary Care: An Observational Study Comparing Homeopathy and Conventional Medicine

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Patient Satisfaction and Side Effects in Primary Care: An Observational Study Comparing Homeopathy and Conventional Medicine

Florica Marian et al. BMC Complement Altern Med. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: This study is part of a nationwide evaluation of complementary medicine in Switzerland (Programme Evaluation of Complementary Medicine PEK) and was funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. The main objective of this study is to investigate patient satisfaction and perception of side effects in homeopathy compared with conventional care in a primary care setting.

Methods: We examined data from two cross-sectional studies conducted in 2002-2003. The first study was a physician questionnaire assessing structural characteristics of practices. The second study was conducted on four given days during a 12-month period in 2002/2003 using a physician and patient questionnaire at consultation and a patient questionnaire mailed to the patient one month later (including Europep questionnaire).The participating physicians were all trained and licensed in conventional medicine. An additional qualification was required for medical doctors providing homeopathy (membership in the Swiss association of homeopathic physicians SVHA).

Results: A total of 6778 adult patients received the questionnaire and 3126 responded (46.1%). Statistically significant differences were found with respect to health status (higher percentage of chronic and severe conditions in the homeopathic group), perception of side effects (higher percentage of reported side effects in the conventional group) and patient satisfaction (higher percentage of satisfied patients in the homeopathic group).

Conclusion: Overall patient satisfaction was significantly higher in homeopathic than in conventional care. Homeopathic treatments were perceived as a low-risk therapy with two to three times fewer side effects than conventional care.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of sampling procedures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Side effects across treatment groups.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 11 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Menniti-Ippolito F, Gargiulo L, Bologna E, Forcella E, Raschetti R. Use of unconventional medicine in Italy: a nation-wide survey. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2002;58:61–64. doi: 10.1007/s00228-002-0435-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11:42–49. - PubMed
    1. Mills SY. The House of Lords report on complementary medicine: a summary. Complement Ther Med. 2001;9:34–39. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2001.0430. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Witt C, Keil T, Selim D, Roll S, Vance W, Wegscheider K, Willich SN. Outcome and costs of homoeopathic and conventional treatment strategies: a comparative cohort study in patients with chronic disorders. Complement Ther Med. 2005;13:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2005.03.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cucherat M, Haugh MC, Gooch M, Boissel JP. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. HMRAG. Homeopathic Medicines Research Advisory Group. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;56:27–33. doi: 10.1007/s002280050716. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback