Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep-Oct;123(5):636-45.
doi: 10.1177/003335490812300514.

Public dental expenditures and dental visits among children in the U.S., 1996-2004

Affiliations

Public dental expenditures and dental visits among children in the U.S., 1996-2004

Thomas P Wall et al. Public Health Rep. 2008 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: Congress created the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in 1997 as an expansion of the Medicaid program to provide health insurance to children whose family income is above the Medicaid eligibility standards-generally up to 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL). This article examines changes in the utilization of dental services during a period of increasing public funding of dental services.

Methods: Public dental expenditure estimates came from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and a breakdown of these expenditures by patient age and income level was based on the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Results: According to CMS, funding for dental SCHIP and dental SCHIP expansion grew from $0 prior to 1998 to $517 million in 2004. According to the MEPS, between 1996 and 2004 there was an increase in the number and percent of children 2 to 20 years of age who reported a dental visit during the past year. These increases were most notable among children in the 100% to 200% FPL category. Approximately 900,000 more children in this income group visited a dentist in 2003-2004 than in 1996-1997. Children in this income group reported an increase in the amount of mean dental charges paid for by Medicaid and a real increase in mean dental charges per patient from $217 to $310.

Conclusions: Recent increases in the public funding of dental services targeted to children in the 100% to 200% FPL category were related to increased utilization of dental services among these children from 1996 to 2004.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in the public funding of dental services, 1996 2005a aIn 2004 U.S. dollars SCHIP = State Children's Health Insurance Program
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total public funding (nominal) of dental services: CMS vs. MEPS CMS = Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services MEPS = Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Figure 3
Figure 3
Medicaid funding of dental services (nominal) for children vs. adults, 1996–2004 MEPSa a2000 data not included. MEPS = Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Figure 4
Figure 4
Reala Medicaid dental expenditures for children aged 0 to 20 years by family income level, 1996–2004 MEPSb aIn 2004 U.S. dollars b2000 data not included. FPL = federal poverty level MEPS = Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Figure 5
Figure 5
Per-patient mean reala annual dental expenditure by sources of funding for children aged 2 to 20 years, by family income level, 1996–1997 MEPS vs. 2003–2004 MEPS (orthodontic services removed) aIn 2004 U.S. dollars MEPS = Medical Expenditure Panel Survey FPL = federal poverty level
Figure 6
Figure 6
Change in reala mean annual dental charges per patient for children aged 2 to 20 years, by family income level, 1996–1997 MEPS vs. 2003–2004 MEPS (orthodontic services removed)b aIn 2004 U.S. dollars bExpenditures represent the fully established charges for care and do not reflect actual payments for services. MEPS = Medical Expenditure Panel Survey FPL = federal poverty level

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health and Human Services (US) Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): DHHS (US): National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health (US); 2000.
    1. McBroome K, Damiano PC, Willard JC. Impact of the Iowa S-SCHIP program on access to dental care for adolescents. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:47–53. - PubMed
    1. Hughes RJ, Damiano PC, Kanellis MJ, Kuthy R, Slayton R. Dentists' participation and children's use of services in the Indiana Dental Medicaid program and SCHIP: assessing the impact of increased fees and administrative changes. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:517–23. - PubMed
    1. Szilagyi PG, Dick AW, Klein JD, Shone LP, Zwanziger J, McInerny T. Improved access and quality of care after enrollment in the New York State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) Pediatrics. 2004;113:e395–404. - PubMed
    1. Duderstadt KG, Hughes DC, Soobader MJ, Newacheck PW. The impact of public insurance expansions on children's access and use of care. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1676–82. - PubMed

MeSH terms