Estimates of clinically useful measures in competing risks survival analysis

Stat Med. 2008 Dec 30;27(30):6407-25. doi: 10.1002/sim.3455.

Abstract

Competing risks occur frequently in follow-up clinical studies. To assess treatment or covariate effects, measures of clinical impact based on crude cumulative incidence should be considered, such as relative risks or the absolute risk reduction. In this work, transformation models through suitable link functions provide a straightforward approach to obtain point and interval estimates of such measures. An extension of the Klein and Andersen proposal, based on pseudo-values, is considered. Non-additive effects were tested by interactions between baseline (spline function on time) and covariates. The methods are applied to the evaluation of the impact of axillary lymph node nanometastases on metastatic relapse of breast cancer patients. Further, a literature data set on prostate cancer was used for illustration.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Axilla
  • Breast Neoplasms / mortality
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery
  • Cause of Death
  • Diethylstilbestrol / administration & dosage
  • Estrogens, Non-Steroidal / administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymph Node Excision
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Male
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Prognosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / mortality
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods
  • Risk
  • Survival Analysis*

Substances

  • Estrogens, Non-Steroidal
  • Diethylstilbestrol