Can VISION 2020 be implemented in rural government settings? Findings from two programmes in Tanzania

Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Oct;13(10):1284-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02140.x.

Abstract

Objective: To generate information on essential components and the cost recovery potential of VISION 2020 programmes in rural Africa.

Methods: We took a structured approach to planning, training, implementation and supervision of programmes in Singida and Mara regions, Tanzania involving both government and non-government partners. Extensive mentoring was provided to monitor activities and costs.

Results: Annual numbers of patients receiving eye care increased sevenfold, cataract surgeries by a factor of 2.6 and spectacles dispensed by a factor of 16. Running costs were shared; the government provided 40-60%, non-government organisations (NGOs) 25-45%, and patient fees 15%.

Conclusion: Comprehensive eye care can be delivered with cooperation among partners. However, continued coordination and cooperation from government and NGOs are critical to reach VISION 2020 goals.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Cataract Extraction* / economics
  • Cataract Extraction* / statistics & numerical data
  • Community Health Services / organization & administration
  • Delivery of Health Care / economics
  • Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Female
  • Government Programs / organization & administration*
  • Health Planning / organization & administration
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Ophthalmology / economics
  • Program Evaluation
  • Rural Health Services / organization & administration*
  • Rural Health Services / standards
  • Tanzania