Background: Patients with heart failure have a poor prognosis. However, it has been presumed that patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular function (LVF) may have a more benign prognosis.
Objectives: We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with heart failure and preserved LVF compared with patients with reduced function and the factors affecting prognosis.
Methods: We prospectively evaluated 289 consecutive patients hospitalized with a definite clinical diagnosis of heart failure based on typical symptoms and signs. They were divided into 2 subsets based on echocardiographic LVF. Patients were followed clinically for a period of 1 year.
Results: Echocardiography showed that more than one third (36%) of the patients had preserved systolic LVF. These patients were more likely to be older and female and have less ischemic heart disease. The survival at 1 year in this group was poor and not significantly different from patients with reduced LVF (75% vs 71%, respectively). The adjusted survival by Cox regression analysis was not significantly different (P=.25). However, patients with preserved LVF had fewer rehospitalizations for heart failure (25% vs 35%, P<.05). Predictors of mortality in the whole group by multivariate analysis were age, diabetes, chronic renal failure, atrial fibrillation, residence in a nursing home, and serum sodium < or = 135 mEq/L.
Conclusion: The prognosis of patients with clinical heart failure with or without preserved LVF is poor. Better treatment modalities are needed in both subsets.