Introduction: In the current context of a high incidence end-stage kidney disease and a shortage of organs for kidney transplantation, the increasing use of transplants considered to be "borderline" represents a potential source of transplants. Over the last 10 years, some centers have developed a transplantation strategy, which consists of transplanting two borderline kidneys that cannot be proposed separately in a single recipient. The authors report their experience of dual kidney transplant.
Materials and methods: Since 2001, 15 dual kidney transplants have been performed in a single centre according to a local protocol based on the correspondence between the weight of the donor kidney and the recipient's weight, weighted by the number of fibrotic glomeruli observed on the initial biopsy. In this study, the authors analyze the postoperative complications and functional results observed in patients transplanted according to this protocol.
Results: Dual kidney transplants represented less than 5% of all transplants performed during the study period concerned, which remained lower than the objectives initially announced by the ABM. The surgical technique was left to the surgeon's discretion. The mean follow-up was 26.3 months. Fourteen of the 15 recipients were alive with a functional graft. Surgical complications were globally more frequent when kidneys were transplanted on the same side (versus transplanted on both sides). Mean serum creatinine was 119.4 mol/l at six months (creatinine clearance according to MDRD formula: 57.3 ml/min per 1.73 m2), 118.8 mol/l at 12 months (creatinine clearance: 55.8) and 132.4 mol/l at 24 months (creatinine clearance: 44.2). One year post-transplant, mean renal function measured by inulin clearance was 55.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Four of the 15 patients had experienced an episode of acute rejection and three patients experienced delayed return of transplant function.
Conclusion: In view of the results obtained, the authors consider that dual kidney transplant could be a reasonable and effective option for selected patients. Positioning of the transplants in each iliac fossa limited the surgical complication rate.