Individual differences in the perception of temporal order: the effect of age and cognition
- PMID: 18988063
- DOI: 10.1080/02643290802504742
Individual differences in the perception of temporal order: the effect of age and cognition
Abstract
Temporal-order judgements in the time range of some milliseconds were assessed by using two auditory tasks in 86 participants, aged from 20 to 69 years. Two stimulus presentation modes, binaural versus monaural, were compared. Elderly participants performed worse than the younger participants; however, different patterns of age-related declines were observed, depending on the presentation mode. In the monaural mode considerable deterioration was observed beyond 60 years of age, whereas in the binaural mode declines were found much earlier, from 40 years of age. Performance of the monaural task correlated with cognitive competences and provided important insight into neuronal timing mechanisms. In contrast, the binaural mode reflected a bias towards an integrated perception of sequential stimuli and was less related to cognitive resources. These findings provide evidence that age-related declines in human sequencing abilities involve, besides temporal mechanisms, also a mode-specific processing, presumably associated with different neuronal mechanisms.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of auditory temporal-order thresholds - a comparison of different measurement procedures and the influences of age and gender.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2005;23(5-6):281-96. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16477090
-
Auditory perception of temporal order in humans: the effect of age, gender, listener practice and stimulus presentation mode.Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jul 31;403(1-2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.04.062. Epub 2006 Jun 5. Neurosci Lett. 2006. PMID: 16750883
-
Perception of temporal order: the effects of age, sex, and cognitive factors.Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009 Mar;16(2):183-202. doi: 10.1080/13825580802411758. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009. PMID: 19105053
-
Does it all go together when it goes? The Nineteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 Aug;46(3):385-434. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401055. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993. PMID: 8378549 Review.
-
Individual differences in temporal information processing in humans.Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2004;64(3):349-66. doi: 10.55782/ane-2004-1519. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2004. PMID: 15283478 Review.
Cited by
-
Event timing in human vision: Modulating factors and independent functions.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0226122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226122. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32853238 Free PMC article.
-
Moments in time.Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Oct 18;5:66. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00066. eCollection 2011. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 22022310 Free PMC article.
-
Sub- and Supra-Second Timing in Auditory Perception: Evidence for Cross-Domain Relationships.Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 12;15:812533. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.812533. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35095407 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of stimulus frequency, spectrum, duration, and location on temporal order judgment thresholds: distribution analysis.Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):968-976. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0915-1. Epub 2017 Sep 8. Psychol Res. 2019. PMID: 28887686
-
Resting-state fMRI functional connectivity of the left temporal parietal junction is associated with visual temporal order threshold.Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 24;12(1):15933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20309-1. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36153359 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical