Nonprimary care physicians' views on office-based quality incentive and improvement programs
- PMID: 19001100
- DOI: 10.1177/1062860608324557
Nonprimary care physicians' views on office-based quality incentive and improvement programs
Abstract
The current pay-for-performance movement in health care has continued to evolve despite the absence of input from physicians and empirical evidence of its effectiveness. The majority of existing quality incentive programs related to physician services is limited to primary care physicians. There is an increasing movement among payers to broaden pay for performance to include nonprimary care physicians. This article reports the results of a survey of nonprimary care physicians' views on office-based quality incentive and improvement programs. Data were collected from surveys completed by nonprimary care physicians practicing cardiology, hematology, oncology, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and urology. Findings indicate that nonprimary care physicians recognize some value in office-based quality incentive and improvement programs. Specialty societies played a significant role in influencing physicians' views on office-based quality improvements. Physicians indicated support for incentive designs that included infrastructure grants to implement improvements in their office such as an electronic medical record.
Similar articles
-
General internists' views on pay-for-performance and public reporting of quality scores: a national survey.Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):492-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.492. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007. PMID: 17339678
-
Fee-for-service lives--in this managed care firm.Manag Care. 1994 May;3(5):42, 44, 46. Manag Care. 1994. PMID: 10140044
-
Physicians' reports of their experience with health plan care management practices.Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP100-10. Am J Manag Care. 2003. PMID: 12822719
-
Pay for performance in the intensive care unit--opportunity or threat?Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):852-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181962b0b. Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19237887 Review.
-
Pay for performance: an overview of the literature.Am J Med Qual. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):140-63. doi: 10.1177/1062860608326517. Epub 2008 Nov 4. Am J Med Qual. 2009. PMID: 18984907 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Specialties differ in which aspects of doctor communication predict overall physician ratings.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):447-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2663-2. Epub 2013 Oct 26. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24163151 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons from healthcare providers' attitudes toward pay-for-performance: what should purchasers consider in designing and implementing a successful program?J Prev Med Public Health. 2012 May;45(3):137-47. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.3.137. Epub 2012 May 31. J Prev Med Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22712040 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pay-for-performance: a survey of specialty providers in urogynecology.J Reprod Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;56(1-2):3-11. J Reprod Med. 2011. PMID: 21366120 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
