Clinical characteristics of bacterial vaginosis among women testing positive for fastidious bacteria
- PMID: 19004865
- PMCID: PMC2708344
- DOI: 10.1136/sti.2008.032821
Clinical characteristics of bacterial vaginosis among women testing positive for fastidious bacteria
Abstract
Objectives: As the aetiology of bacterial vaginosis (BV) is not well understood, this study sought to determine the relationships between several fastidious microbes, BV and selected clinical characteristics of BV.
Methods: Endometrial and cervical specimens from 50 women with non-gonococcal, non-chlamydial endometritis were tested for Leptotrichia sanguinegens/amnionii, Atopobium vaginae, bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria 1 (BVAB1), Ureaplasma urealyticum biovar 2 (UU-2) and Ureaplasma parvum using PCR. BV was categorised using Nugent's and Amsel's criteria. Odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age and race were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Although elevated pH was a universal feature, other BV characteristics differed by pathogen, suggesting variable clinical presentation. Only UU-2 was strongly associated with vaginal discharge, but a positive whiff test and a 20% or greater classification of epithelial cells as clue cells were more common among women with L sanguinegens/amnionii, A vaginae and BVAB1. For each of these bacteria, there were trends towards associations with BV defined by Amsel's criteria (L sanguinegens/amnionii OR 2.9, 95% CI 0.5 to 15.7; A vaginae OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.6 to 11.4; BVAB1 OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 31.1) and significant associations with BV defined by Gram stain (L sanguinegens/amnionii OR 17.7, 95% CI 2.8 to 113.0; A vaginae OR 19.2, 95% CI 3.7 to 98.7; BVAB1 OR 21.1, 95% CI 2.2 to 198.5).
Conclusions: L sanguinegens/amnionii, A vaginae and BVAB1 are associated with clinical characteristics consistent with BV and BV defined by Nugent's and Amsel's criteria. These fastidious bacteria may cause unrecognised infection, as none was associated with abnormal vaginal discharge.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
How important are the newly described bacteria in bacterial vaginosis?Sex Transm Infect. 2009 Aug;85(4):240-1. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.034603. Sex Transm Infect. 2009. PMID: 19625293 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Identification of novel microbes associated with pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility.Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Sep;92(6):441-6. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052285. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Sex Transm Infect. 2016. PMID: 26825087 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Novel bacterial vaginosis-associated organisms mediate the relationship between vaginal douching and pelvic inflammatory disease.Sex Transm Infect. 2020 Sep;96(6):439-444. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054191. Epub 2019 Dec 6. Sex Transm Infect. 2020. PMID: 31810995 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Nugent's score and each Amsel's criteria in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Nov;87(11):1270-4. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004. PMID: 15825698
-
Characterization of the vaginal microflora in health and disease.Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4830. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 24814599 Review.
-
An update on the role of Atopobium vaginae in bacterial vaginosis: what to consider when choosing a treatment? A mini review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05142-8. Epub 2019 Apr 5. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 30953190 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The vaginal microbiota and innate immunity after local excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Genome Med. 2021 Nov 4;13(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00977-w. Genome Med. 2021. PMID: 34736529 Free PMC article.
-
Sneathia: an emerging pathogen in female reproductive disease and adverse perinatal outcomes.Crit Rev Microbiol. 2021 Aug;47(4):517-542. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2021.1905606. Epub 2021 Apr 6. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33823747 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vaginal microbiota evaluation and prevalence of key pathogens in ecuadorian women: an epidemiologic analysis.Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 27;10(1):18358. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74655-z. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33110095 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial Vaginosis: Current Diagnostic Avenues and Future Opportunities.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Aug 11;10:354. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00354. eCollection 2020. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32850469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cross-sectional study of urethral exposures at last sexual episode associated with non-gonococcal urethritis among STD clinic patients.Sex Transm Infect. 2019 May;95(3):212-218. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053634. Epub 2018 Sep 4. Sex Transm Infect. 2019. PMID: 30181326 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Haggerty CL, Hillier SL, Bass DC, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and anaerobic bacteria are associated with endometritis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:990–5 - PubMed
-
- Westrom L. Effect of acute pelvic inflammatory disease on fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;121:707–13 - PubMed
-
- Klebanoff MA, Hillier SL, Nugent RP, et al. Is bacterial vaginosis a stronger risk factor for preterm birth when it is diagnosed earlier in gestation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:470–7 - PubMed
-
- Myer L, Denny L, Telerant R, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and susceptibility to HIV infection in South African women: a nested case-control study [see Comment]. J Infect Dis 2005;192:1372–80 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials