Hemodynamic effects of 6% and 10% hydroxyethyl starch solutions versus 4% albumin solution in septic patients

J Clin Anesth. 2008 Nov;20(7):528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.05.022. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

Abstract

Study objective: To compare the hemodynamic effects of two different concentrations of pentastarch hydroxyethyl starch (HES; 200/0.5) solutions with a 4% human albumin solution for fluid resuscitation.

Design: Open-label, randomized, controlled study.

Setting: Medical-surgical intensive care unit.

Patients: 34 consecutive, hemodynamically stable, adult patients with sepsis and suspected hypovolemia.

Interventions: Patients received a 400 mL infusion of either 10% HES (n = 11), 6% HES (n = 10), or 4% albumin (n = 13) over 40 minutes.

Measurements: Hemodynamic and blood data were collected 40, 70, 100, and 160 minutes after the start of the fluid challenge.

Main results: Cardiac index, stroke volume index, and left ventricular stroke work index increased more in the 10% HES group than the 6% HES or albumin groups (P < 0.05). Oxygen delivery increased only in the 10% HES group. A decrease in hemoglobin concentration occurred in all three groups but was greatest in the 10% HES group.

Conclusions: HES is as effective as albumin for volume resuscitation in septic patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Female
  • Hemodynamics / drug effects*
  • Hemoglobins / analysis
  • Humans
  • Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives / administration & dosage*
  • Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Oxygen Consumption / drug effects
  • Plasma Substitutes / administration & dosage*
  • Plasma Substitutes / adverse effects
  • Sepsis / physiopathology*
  • Serum Albumin / administration & dosage*
  • Serum Albumin / adverse effects
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Hemoglobins
  • Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives
  • Plasma Substitutes
  • Serum Albumin