Screening for lead poisoning: a geospatial approach to determine testing of children in at-risk neighborhoods

J Pediatr. 2009 Mar;154(3):409-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.09.027. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a spatial strategy to assess neighborhood risk for lead exposure and neighborhood-level blood lead testing of young children living in the city of Atlanta, Georgia.

Study design: This ecologic study used existing blood lead results of children aged <or=36 months tested and living in one of Atlanta's 236 neighborhoods in 2005. Geographic information systems used Census, land parcel, and neighborhood spatial data to create a neighborhood priority testing index on the basis of proxies for poverty (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children [WIC] enrollment) and lead in house paint (year housing built).

Results: In 2005, only 11.9% of Atlanta's 18,627 children aged <or=36 months living in the city had blood lead tests, despite a high prevalence of risk factors: 75,286 (89.6%) residential properties were built before 1978, and 44% of children were enrolled in WIC. Linear regression analysis indicated testing was significantly associated with WIC status (P < .001) but not with old housing.

Conclusions: This neighborhood spatial approach provided smaller geographic areas to assign risk and assess testing in a city that has a high prevalence of risk factors for lead exposure. Testing may be improved by collaboration between pediatricians and public health practitioners.

MeSH terms

  • Child, Preschool
  • Environmental Exposure / statistics & numerical data*
  • Geography*
  • Georgia / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Lead / blood
  • Lead Poisoning / blood
  • Lead Poisoning / epidemiology*
  • Mass Screening*
  • Residence Characteristics
  • Risk
  • Urban Health / statistics & numerical data
  • Urban Population / statistics & numerical data

Substances

  • Lead