Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 198 (1), 33-7

Comparison of Performance in Two Diagnostic Methods for Tuberculosis Infection

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Performance in Two Diagnostic Methods for Tuberculosis Infection

Kazue Higuchi et al. Med Microbiol Immunol.

Abstract

Performance of two diagnoses, T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G), was compared in Japanese subjects. Forty-seven confirmed tuberculosis patients and eighty-four healthy subjects were recruited. All samples were assessed for both T-SPOT and QFT-G, and the sensitivities and the specificities were compared between two methods. The sensitivity was 100% for T-SPOT, and 87.2% for QFT-G. The specificity was 83.3 and 98.8%, respectively. The overall agreement of two tests was substantially high (Kappa coefficient = 0.671). The sensitivity of T-SPOT appeared to be higher than that of QFT-G, whereas the specificity of T-SPOT was significantly lower than that of QFT-G. The difference in the performance between T-SPOT and QFT-G and biological relevance of each system in diagnosing M. tuberculosis infection should be further explored.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 5 articles

References

    1. J Exp Med. 1997 Sep 15;186(6):859-65 - PubMed
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(4):824-8 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:93-129 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Aug 1;45(3):322-8 - PubMed
    1. Trends Immunol. 2006 Jan;27(1):11-6 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Feedback