Assessing the need for developing a comprehensive content-validated pressure ulcer guideline
- PMID: 19037134
Assessing the need for developing a comprehensive content-validated pressure ulcer guideline
Abstract
Healthcare professionals need evidence-based strategies and guidelines for care to optimize pressure ulcer prevention and management. Differences among pressure ulcer guidelines confuse caregivers, reducing consistency of care. To assess the need for a comprehensive content-validated guideline document, the Association for the Advancement of Wound Care Guideline Subcommittee evaluated current pressure ulcer guideline recommendations by compiling 10 pressure ulcer-specific guidelines existing before June 2008 on the National Guideline Clearinghouse website along with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (draft), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (draft), and Wound Healing Society guidelines. Steps for each aspect of pressure ulcer management were compiled and inconsistent recommendations identified. Currently available pressure ulcer guidelines were found to differ in definitions, aspects of care, validation, evidence criteria, and procedural recommendations, potentially affecting consistency and quality of all aspects of pressure ulcer management, including diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and outcomes measurement. To address these inconsistencies, a comprehensive list of Pressure Ulcer Care Initiative (PUCI) steps was prepared for content validation and posted on www.aawconline.org, enabling healthcare professionals interested in improving the consistency and quality of pressure ulcer prevention and care to participate in this process. All steps with a content validity index > 0.75 (rated clinically relevant by survey respondents) and/or with A-level standardized clinical evidence support will be included in the comprehensive PUCI guideline. Content validation of recommendations is an important first step to improving the consistency of pressure ulcer care.
Similar articles
-
Understanding pressure ulcer research and education needs: a comparison of the association for the advancement of wound care pressure ulcer guideline evidence levels and content validity scores.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2011 Nov;57(11):22-35. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2011. PMID: 22068430
-
Development of a content-validated venous ulcer guideline.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Nov;52(11):32-48. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006. PMID: 17146117
-
Pressure ulcer research: pressure ulcer treatment. A monograph from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.Adv Wound Care. 1998 Oct;11(6):294-300; quiz 302. Adv Wound Care. 1998. PMID: 10326346 Review.
-
The process of developing best practice guidelines for nurses in Ontario: risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 Oct;48(10):30-2, 34-8. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002. PMID: 12378001
-
Evidence-based management of chronic wounds.Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007 Nov;20(11):591-600. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000284936.32707.8d. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007. PMID: 17975367 Review.
Cited by
-
Content validation of terms and definitions in a wound glossary.J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2012 Jul 22;3(4):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcws.2012.07.001. eCollection 2011 Dec. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2012. PMID: 24527368 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
