Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):542-61.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00922.x. Epub 2008 Nov 24.

Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates

Affiliations

Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates

Marc N Elliott et al. Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Adjust for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency (ERT) in ratings of health care, which otherwise obscure disparities in patient experience.

Data source: 117,102 respondents to the 2004 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Medicare Fee-for-Service survey.

Study design: Multinomial logistic regression is used to model respondents' use of extremes of the 0-10 CAHPS rating scales as a function of education. A new two-stage model adjusts for both standard case-mix effects and ERT. Ratings of subgroups are compared after these adjustments.

Principal findings: Medicare beneficiaries with greater educational attainment are less likely to use both extremes of the 0-10 rating scale than those with less attainment. Adjustments from the two-stage model may differ substantially from standard adjustments and resolve or attenuate several counterintuitive findings in subgroup comparisons.

Conclusions: Addressing ERT may be important when estimating disparities or comparing providers if patient populations differ markedly in educational attainment. Failures to do so may result in misdirected resources for reducing disparities and inaccurate assessment of some providers. Depending upon the application, ERT may be addressed by the two-stage approach developed here or through specified categorical or stratified reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bashshur RL, Metzner CA, Worden C. Consumer Satisfaction with Group Practice, the CHA Case. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation's Health. 1967;57(11):1991–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J-BEM. Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation. Journal of Marketing Research. 2001;38(2):143–56.
    1. Bernard SL, Brody ER, West ND. Medicare CAHPS Fee-for-Service Survey, Subgroup Analysis Results (2000–2003) Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2004a.
    1. Bernard SL, Brody ER, West ND. Medicare CAHPS Fee-for-Service Survey, Subgroup Analysis Results (2000–2003) Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2004b.
    1. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient Satisfaction as an Indicator of Quality of Care. Inquiry. 1988;25(1):25–36. - PubMed

Publication types