Resin-retained bridges: fibre-reinforced versus metal

Dent Update. 2008 Oct;35(8):521-2, 524-6. doi: 10.12968/denu.2008.35.8.521.

Abstract

Resin-retained bridges (RRBs) have become an accepted part of the restorative dentist's armamentarium. Despite disadvantages, such as more frequent rates of debonding than conventionally-luted bridges, RRBs hold advantages such as their minimally invasive preparation and reduced cost, along with good patient acceptance. RRBs have traditionally been formed of a metal framework with porcelain coverage: most recently, fibre-reinforced RRBs (FRRRBs) have become available, using fibres to reinforce a laboratory composite material. They may also be formed intra-orally. This paper discusses the current status of indirectly-placed FRRRBs, their principal advantages being their improved aesthetics because they are tooth-coloured, and a principal disadvantage being a lack of long-term clinical research.

Clinical relevance: In cases where the visibility of metal may compromise the appearance of a metal-based RRB, a fibre-reinforced, resin-retained bridge may provide a clinical solution.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Composite Resins / chemistry*
  • Dental Alloys / chemistry*
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Dental Porcelain / chemistry
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Denture Design*
  • Denture, Partial, Fixed, Resin-Bonded*
  • Esthetics, Dental
  • Female
  • Glass / chemistry*
  • Humans
  • Incisor / injuries
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pliability
  • Polymethyl Methacrylate / chemistry
  • Retreatment
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Tooth Loss / rehabilitation
  • Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic / methods

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Alloys
  • Dental Materials
  • Sinfony composite resin
  • Stick resin
  • fiberglass
  • Dental Porcelain
  • Polymethyl Methacrylate