Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children
- PMID: 19066257
- PMCID: PMC2600962
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a2428
Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether full elbow extension as assessed by the elbow extension test can be used in routine clinical practice to rule out bony injury in patients presenting with elbow injury.
Design: Adults: multicentre prospective interventional validation study in secondary care. Children: multicentre prospective observational study in secondary care.
Setting: Five emergency departments in southwest England.
Participants: 2127 adults and children presenting to the emergency department with acute elbow injury.
Intervention: Elbow extension test during routine care by clinical staff to determine the need for radiography in adults and to guide follow-up in children.
Main outcome measures: Presence of elbow fracture on radiograph, or recovery with no indication for further review at 7-10 days.
Results: Of 1740 eligible participants, 602 patients were able to fully extend their elbow; 17 of these patients had a fracture. Two adult patients with olecranon fractures needed a change in treatment. In the 1138 patients without full elbow extension, 521 fractures were identified. Overall, the test had sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) for detecting elbow fracture of 96.8% (95.0 to 98.2) and 48.5% (45.6 to 51.4). Full elbow extension had a negative predictive value for fracture of 98.4% (96.3 to 99.5) in adults and 95.8% (92.6 to 97.8) in children. Negative likelihood ratios were 0.03 (0.01 to 0.08) in adults and 0.11 (0.06 to 0.19) in children.
Conclusion: The elbow extension test can be used in routine practice to inform clinical decision making. Patients who cannot fully extend their elbow after injury should be referred for radiography, as they have a nearly 50% chance of fracture. For those able to fully extend their elbow, radiography can be deferred if the practitioner is confident that an olecranon fracture is not present. Patients who do not undergo radiography should return if symptoms have not resolved within 7-10 days.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
The rational clinical examination in emergency care.BMJ. 2008 Dec 15;337:a2374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2374. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 19074943 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to rule out elbow fracture: a systematic review.Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Jun;26(2):182-190. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00948. Epub 2022 Aug 16. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023. PMID: 35971600 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extension test and ossal point tenderness cannot accurately exclude significant injury in acute elbow trauma.Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;64(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Feb 13. Ann Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24530106
-
Range of elbow movement as a predictor of bony injury in children.Emerg Med J. 2011 Aug;28(8):666-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.091124. Epub 2010 Aug 15. Emerg Med J. 2011. PMID: 20713361
-
Deriving the East Riding Elbow Rule (ER2): a maximally sensitive decision tool for elbow injury.Emerg Med J. 2014 May;31(5):380-3. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202169. Epub 2013 Feb 8. Emerg Med J. 2014. PMID: 23397014
-
Diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, and bedside ultrasound for diagnosis of extremity fractures in the emergency department: a systematic review.Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/acem.12058. Acad Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 23570473 Review.
Cited by
-
Elbow trauma in children: development and evaluation of radiological artificial intelligence models.Res Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023 Apr 29;6:100029. doi: 10.1016/j.redii.2023.100029. eCollection 2023 Jun. Res Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023. PMID: 39077546 Free PMC article.
-
Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures in Pediatric Patients.Children (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;10(6):1033. doi: 10.3390/children10061033. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37371265 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and validation of the paediatric elbow trauma (PET) rules as a decision rule for radiography in traumatic elbow injuries: a study protocol.BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Apr;7(1):e001833. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001833. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023. PMID: 37105597 Free PMC article.
-
Extra Lateral Pin or Less Radiation? A Comparison of Two Different Pin Configurations in the Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fracture.Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;10(3):550. doi: 10.3390/children10030550. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36980108 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to rule out elbow fracture: a systematic review.Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Jun;26(2):182-190. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00948. Epub 2022 Aug 16. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023. PMID: 35971600 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Reardon M, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA 1993;269:1127-32. - PubMed
-
- Stiell IG, Wells GA, McDowell I, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Cwinn AA, et al. Use of radiography in acute knee injuries: need for clinical decision rules. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:966-73. - PubMed
-
- Perry JJ, Stiell IG. Impact of clinical decision rules on clinical care of traumatic injuries to the foot and ankle, knee, cervical spine, and head. Injury 2006;37:1157-65. - PubMed
-
- Docherty MA, Schwab RA, Ma OJ. Can elbow extension be used as a test of clinically significant injury? South Med J 2002;95:539-41. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical