This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Email citation

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2009 Feb 1;27(4):639-40; author reply 641-2.

doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9341. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

Flawed inferences about screening mammography's benefit based on observational data

Donald A Berry, Cornelia J Baines, Michael Baum, Kay Dickersin, Suzanne W Fletcher, Peter C Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Bernard Junod, Jan Maehlen, Lisa M Schwartz, H Gilbert Welch, Steven Woloshin, Hazel Thornton, Per-Henrik Zahl

PMID: 19075270
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9341

Comment

Flawed inferences about screening mammography's benefit based on observational data

Donald A Berry et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009.

. 2009 Feb 1;27(4):639-40; author reply 641-2.

doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9341. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

Authors

Donald A Berry, Cornelia J Baines, Michael Baum, Kay Dickersin, Suzanne W Fletcher, Peter C Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Bernard Junod, Jan Maehlen, Lisa M Schwartz, H Gilbert Welch, Steven Woloshin, Hazel Thornton, Per-Henrik Zahl

PMID: 19075270
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9341

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer.
Badgwell BD, Giordano SH, Duan ZZ, Fang S, Bedrosian I, Kuerer HM, Singletary SE, Hunt KK, Hortobagyi GN, Babiera G. Badgwell BD, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2482-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.8058. Epub 2008 Apr 21. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18427152

Similar articles

Mammography's upside outweighs possible risks.
Feig SA, Hendrick RE. Feig SA, et al. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1993 Mar;15(3):121-5, 128, 141. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1993. PMID: 10148388 No abstract available.
Process mapping boosts mammography's efficiency and quality.
Whitman GJ, Venable SL, Stelling CB, Kushwaha AC, Harrington A, Lifshitz O. Whitman GJ, et al. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1999 Sep;21(9):53-5. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1999. PMID: 10623318 No abstract available.
Large-scale effort tests digital mammography's potential.
Anderson LF. Anderson LF. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Apr 20;86(8):580-2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.8.580. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994. PMID: 8145271 No abstract available.
Mammography benefits for women under 50: a closer look at the controversy.
Aiken LS, Jackson KM. Aiken LS, et al. Womens Health. 1996 Winter;2(4):235-42; discussion 261-6. Womens Health. 1996. PMID: 9421558 Review.
Age and interval for screening mammography: whom do you believe?
Venta LA, Goodhartz LA. Venta LA, et al. Semin Surg Oncol. 1996 Sep-Oct;12(5):281-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199609/10)12:5<281::AID-SSU2>3.0.CO;2-9. Semin Surg Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8873315 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Research studies on screening tests.
Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS. Aggarwal R, et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):168-171. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_111_22. Epub 2022 Jun 30. Perspect Clin Res. 2022. PMID: 35928637 Free PMC article.
Breast cancer incidence and survival in Scotland by socio-economic deprivation and tumour subtype.
Mesa-Eguiagaray I, Wild SH, Bird SM, Williams LJ, Brewster DH, Hall PS, Figueroa JD. Mesa-Eguiagaray I, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):463-473. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06632-1. Epub 2022 Jun 1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022. PMID: 35648299 Free PMC article.
Breast cancer and the black swan.
Retsky M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W, James T, Rogers R, Baum M, Vaidya JS, Erhabor O, Forget P. Retsky M, et al. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 May 28;14:1050. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1050. eCollection 2020. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020. PMID: 32565903 Free PMC article. Review.
Choice of relative or cause-specific approach to cancer survival analysis impacts estimates differentially by cancer type, population, and application: evidence from a Canadian population-based cohort study.
Withrow DR, Pole JD, Nishri ED, Tjepkema M, Marrett LD. Withrow DR, et al. Popul Health Metr. 2017 Jul 3;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12963-017-0142-4. Popul Health Metr. 2017. PMID: 28673318 Free PMC article.
Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.
Braithwaite D, Walter LC, Izano M, Kerlikowske K. Braithwaite D, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 May;31(5):561-72. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3580-3. Epub 2016 Jan 29. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26831305 Free PMC article. Review.

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Atypon
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information