Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
, 10 (5), e51

A Digital Smoking Cessation Program Delivered Through Internet and Cell Phone Without Nicotine Replacement (Happy Ending): Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized Controlled Trial

A Digital Smoking Cessation Program Delivered Through Internet and Cell Phone Without Nicotine Replacement (Happy Ending): Randomized Controlled Trial

Håvar Brendryen et al. J Med Internet Res.


Background: Happy Ending (HE) is an intense 1-year smoking cessation program delivered via the Internet and cell phone. HE consists of more than 400 contacts by email, Web pages, interactive voice response, and short message service technology. HE includes a craving helpline and a relapse prevention system, providing just-in-time therapy. All the components of the program are fully automated.

Objective: The objectives were to describe the rationale for the design of HE, to assess the 12-month efficacy of HE in a sample of smokers willing to attempt to quit without the use of nicotine replacement therapy, and to explore the potential effect of HE on coping planning and self-efficacy (prior to quitting) and whether coping planning and self-efficacy mediate treatment effect.

Methods: A two-arm randomized controlled trial was used. Subjects were recruited via Internet advertisements and randomly assigned to condition. Inclusion criteria were willingness to quit on a prescribed day without using nicotine replacement and being aged 18 years or older. The intervention group received HE, and the control group received a 44-page self-help booklet. Abstinence was defined as "not even a puff of smoke, for the last seven days" and was assessed by means of Internet surveys or telephone interviews 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postcessation. The main outcome was repeated point abstinence (ie, abstinence at all four time points). Coping planning and self-efficacy were measured at baseline and at the end of the preparation phase (ie, after 2 weeks of treatment, but prior to cessation day).

Results: A total of 290 participants received either the HE intervention (n=144) or the control booklet (n=146). Using intent-to-treat analysis, participants in the intervention group reported clinically and statistically significantly higher repeated point abstinence rates than control participants (20% versus 7%, odds ratio [OR] = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.60-7.34, P = .002). Although no differences were observed at baseline, by the end of the preparation phase, significantly higher levels of coping planning (t(261) = 3.07, P = .002) and precessation self-efficacy (t(261) = 2.63, P = .01) were observed in the intervention group compared with the control group. However, neither coping planning nor self-efficacy mediated long-term treatment effect. For point abstinence 1 month after quitting, however, coping planning and self-efficacy showed a partial mediation of the treatment effect.

Conclusions: This 12-month trial documents a long-term treatment effect of a fully automated smoking cessation intervention without the use of nicotine replacement therapy. The study adds to the promise of using digital media in supporting behavior change.

Conflict of interest statement

The second author has a financial interest in the intervention under scrutiny, as a shareholder of Happy Ending AS.


Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participants

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 72 articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Strecher V J. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Feb;36(2):107–17. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00128-1.S0738-3991(98)00128-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walters Scott T, Wright Jo Anne, Shegog Ross. A review of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior. Addict Behav. 2006 Feb;31(2):264–77. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.002.S0306-4603(05)00095-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brandon T H, Tiffany S T, Obremski K M, Baker T B. Postcessation cigarette use: the process of relapse. Addict Behav. 1990;15(2):105–14. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90013-N.0306-4603(90)90013-N - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbert Hazel M, Warburton David M. Attribution and the effects of expectancy: how beliefs can influence the experiences of smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2003 Sep;28(7):1359–69. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00249-6.S0306460302002496 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kenford Susan L, Smith Stevens S, Wetter David W, Jorenby Douglas E, Fiore Michael C, Baker Timothy B. Predicting relapse back to smoking: contrasting affective and physical models of dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Feb;70(1):216–27. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.216. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types