Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Feb;24(2):170-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0885-5. Epub 2008 Dec 19.

Patient experiences with coordination of care: the benefit of continuity and primary care physician as referral source

Ann S O'Malley  1 , Peter J Cunningham
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patient experiences with coordination of care: the benefit of continuity and primary care physician as referral source

Ann S O'Malley et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Coordination across a patient's health needs and providers is important to improving the quality of care.

Objectives: (1) Describe the extent to which adults report that their care is coordinated between their primary care physician (PCP) and specialists and (2) determine whether visit continuity with one's PCP and the PCP as the referral source for specialist visits are associated with higher coordination ratings.

Design: Cross-sectional study of the 2007 Health Tracking Household Survey.

Participants: A total of 3,436 adults with a PCP and one or more visits to a specialist in the past 12 months.

Measurements: Coordination measures were patient perceptions of (1) how informed and up to date the PCP was about specialist care received, (2) whether the PCP talked with the patient about what happened at the recent specialist visit and (3) how well different doctors caring for a patient's chronic condition work together to manage that care.

Results: Less than half of respondents (46%) reported that their PCP always seemed informed about specialist care received. Visit continuity with the PCP was associated with better coordination of specialist care. For example, 62% of patients who usually see the same PCP reported that their PCP discussed with them what happened at their recent specialist visit vs. 48% of those who do not usually see the same PCP (adjusted percentages, p < 0.0001). When a patient's recent specialist visit was based on PCP referral (vs. self-referral or some other source), 50% reported that the PCP was informed and up to date about specialist care received (vs. 35%, p < 0.0001), and 66% reported that their PCP discussed with them what happened at their recent specialist visit (vs. 47%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Facilitating visit continuity between the patient and PCP, and encouraging the use of the PCP as the referral source would likely enhance care coordination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survey item flow and content, frequencies and (weighted percentages).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. None
    2. Starfield B. Primary care: Balancing health needs, services and technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998:438.
    1. McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, et al. Care Coordination. Vol 7 of: Shojania KG, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Owens DK, editors. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Technical review No. 9 (Prepared by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center under contract 290-02-0017). AHRQ Publication No. 04(07)-0051-7. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. June 2007.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. 1996. National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 395 pp.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8849148', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8849148/'}]}
    2. Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, et al. Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:640–5. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17494478', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17494478/'}]}
    2. Anderson R, Barbara A, Feldman S. What patients want: A content analysis of key qualities that influence patient satisfaction. J Med Pract Manage. 2007;22(5):255–61. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms